OCR Text |
Show bar 1921 , ( would wotild ) meet conditions 77 , as far , as flow is concerned , ( which which'-" which ) is the average for ( September Septeniber ) ( based 'based based ) on these records from 1921 to 1928 . , A party who had gone through the canyon during ( September Septeinber ) , 1922 , would have flow conditions ( corre eorra- eorra ) sponding to one about ( one-half onehalf ) of what ( might inight ) ( nor- nor ) ( mally inally ) be expected during September . A party going through in ( September Septeinber ) , 1927 , would have had flow conditions two and ( one-half onehalf ) times of what would normally be expected ( during duriug ) ( Sep Sep- Sep ) ¬ tember . Now , in case the ( maximum maximuln ) and minimum flows are desired to be known for any particular months , those are given in these . In 1920 , one party had flows ranging from 6,830 for a ( minimum ininimum ) , to 25,200 for a maximum . The tables show not only the flow occurring ( dur dur- dur ) ¬ ing the ( month mouth ) , but for ready reference the ( compari conipari ) , sons with similar flows of other months . It contains a ( similar si-inilar siinilar ) presentation for ( all 01 ) of the gaging stations , Cisco , Lees ( Ferry-all Ferryall ) of the gaging stations on the Colorado and Green rivers which have been referred to in the case , and for which the original records have been introduced . Going over further , on page 44 is a table which shows a compilation for ( ready Teady ) reference of the flowsthat have been recorded at Lees Ferry during the period 1922 to 19 8 , This table is of ( iui- iui ) portance in the case . For instance , with . a flow of 7,000 ( second-feet secondfeet ) at Lees Ferry , this report shows |