| OCR Text |
Show Page 1 of 1 Korral Broschinsky Holt, Connie <CHolt@pblutah.com> From: To: <k.broschinsky@worldnet.att.net> Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 11 :11 AM RE: Bradley's Comment Subject: Korral: Here is what Martha Bradley had to say . -----Original Message----From: Bradley, Martha [mailto:bradlcv{iilfoIlDlaiuhead.arch.utah .cg.!!] Sent: Tuesday, May 21 , 2002 10:47 AM To: Holt, Connie Subject: Re : National Register Nomination Question Connie: My general reaction to the nomination was that despite your excellent research and presentation of the research, it is highly unlikely it would be put on the register because of its delapidated state. Despite the interest of the complex of structures, the fact that most are severely destroyed or at least have their integrity seriously threatened or jeopardized, it isn't likely that it would be a successful nomination. Another route would be for the city to place the site on their city register which would line it up for certain types of recognition. Just because its old and has interesting history doesn't mean it is intact enough for inclusion on the registrar sorry to say. The tricky part of this nomination, if you are going to push it forward would be to rewrite and greatly strengthen the significance section tying it directly and specifically to as many different criteria (as listed in the materials I gave you) as possible. I would be happy to look at a draft and comment on it if you choose to take that route . Martha ---------- Original Message ---------------------------------From: "Holt, Connie" <CHolt@pblutah.com> Date: Tue, 21 May 200210:01 :28 -0600 >HiMartha. > >Sorry to bother you, but if you have a minute, I wanted to know if you had >any comments or additions >to my draft nomination. The reason is that Murray City would like to use >what I turned in and they >want to know what comments you had as the professional historian. I would >also like to hear those. >Connie > > 6/28/02 |
