| OCR Text |
Show AnsWers to Lovcjoy Question: . 2 these investigations, ,W is it willing to authorise some d1§55n 3 interested persons or body to make such investigatlons' 33""; jpending: the investigations, will the Board suspend its *action with reference to the professors concerned? In our judgment there should be no unwilling-.i Answer. ness on the part of the Board of Regents to making these ;3 investigations, hence, no necessity for disinterested personfi‘ fto make any investigations whatever. We feel that the Boardfii of Regents is the proper tribunal to take the evidence and .%r \J :determine the facts in the controversy; and that they are muff authorized, neither would they be justified, those powers or duties in delegating 'E* imposed upon them as Regents of the, H; .' ill. University. Respectfully submitted, (Signed) W. W.A§m§trong, ' Minority of Special Commute The Minority Report of the Special ComMitteeESoncurrm%3 in by the undersigned: 53 (Signed) Ernest Bamberger Regent (Signed) Geo. C. Whitmore Regent (Signed) W. W. Armstrong Regent The vote on the majority report as amended, was 9 fess; .T!‘ and 2 against, with Regent Gemmell excused from voting by unanimous consent. The Committee of the Whole now arose and reported itS‘: =findings to the Chairman of the Board. Regent Young move@,%5 the adoption of the majority report as recorded above. Gemmell was unanimously excused from voting. 'Régwfi Eegents Midi. ton and Whitmore were absent, but by request their votes 5{ k were cast as requested, by other membersg It was decided that a cepy sf thfififiifigf£§$;3 7.%3L£" |
