| OCR Text |
Show QuestionWIV. If the two foregoing questions are answered in the negative. for what reasons does the Board, ing circumstances, refuse this investigation? Answer 17. in exist- Our foregoing replies answer this question. Question 18. Is the Board at the present time willing to inquire into the reasons for the supersession of Professor Marshall in the headship of the Department of English? Answer 18. No, because the Board believes that it has sufficiently inquired into the matter. You will observe that in the Board‘s public statement hereto attached, pages 5 and 4 it is stated; "Where changes have been made in the Faculty for the coming year, the President has inquired whether it is the desire of all the persons affected by changes to have the Board of Regents make public the reasons given to it by ' the President. tively." The following persons have replied affirma- The four persons who answered affirmatively are Dr. Knowlton, Associate Professor Wise and Instructors Snow and Bing. No other person affected by a change replied in the affirmative, As head of the Department of English, Prof- essor Marshall received a salary of $2,500.00. remains the same for the coming academic year, His salary and in addi- tion, he will have less work and we believe of a more congenial nature. Question 19. Does the resolution recently adopted by the Board, providing for a Faculty Relations Committee and for direct Conferences between it and committees selected by the Faculty, imply that hereafter charges against prof- essors, or recommendations respecting professors, Will be investigated by the Board, or by some committee thereof, by the when requests for such investigations are made Faculty 60mmittee? Anewer 19. Yes, but we cannot permit you to infer that been investicharges against professors have not heretofore gated. to At this point we desire to copy the resolution which-you refer, namely: |
