| OCR Text |
Show 167 public for resources society (van poverty-reducing de Walle rather than 1995), consideration, although these objective is Targeting directly as education and spending on the primary education is primary health on education education level is one of the most explicitly approach, identified schemes targeted and means-tested social women; poor to the areas (van are the name reached capital implies, or narrow does not aim at or basic social services-such as are by targeting In this examples. regard, candidates for broad prime capital especially of the economy in general, and that of the poor lead to direct growth effects. can vital for poverty narrow targeting, poor. to poor at reduction, because primary 2001). focuses benefits Examples on specific include food-based mothers; cash transfers such schemes for the poor de Well Spending services the poor need to escape from poverty and Rahman 2001; Case determination of "broad making process. services common care efficiency targeting as assistance; microcredit schemes targeted public employment geographic as Targeting care-are important as in the decision with has, for example, significant positive redistributive and increased human The second food-stamp targeting, the poor. heavily by (World Bank 2001b; Addison families Broad 1998). effects because it raises the human particular, entirely lost basic education and basic health targeting. Spending in not individuals. Rather, the poor commodities consumed primary being primarily preoccupied take either of two forms: broad practice Well 1995, targeting (van de the poor could in the poorest sections of by targeting programs 1998). In this are development chapter, the individuals schemes family to such as allowances rural landless programs focused empirical or on work is confined targeting" by regional governments using estimates of |
