| OCR Text |
Show 75 inequality" has been "central" in and level of inequality results in this chapter between ethnic groups has not been shown show that total within ethnic groups and not the inequality Only groups. are used same explained by as results on governments is misguided. factors. The inequality In other which regional governments, defined are within ethnic groups and within their analysis as only by failure of the overall is chapter on is 10 methodology objective of equitable organized inequality and that exists within ethnic ethnic lines, is own regions demographics of the the decomposition regional eliminated, aggregate to address will determine the success use defined groups. It shows that the economic of groups, however analysis. used in this This is then followed chapter. and development. to individual level of decomposition analysis household region, follows. The next section discusses the economics as "culturally" and discussion of the results. The of the inequality percent. Thus, what regional governments do gradually appreciating compared by inequality ethnic groups. About 90 percent of policy implication along inequality literature The words, if inequality between ethnic groups and is reduced The more between ethnic groups and between inequality or is driven Ethiopia the found when are decomposition is that the focus analysis in empirically. percent of the total is explained by the inequality that exists between ethnic groups. The education inequality by inequality between in the country is 10 the federal program. However, the existence guiding as level of analysis The next two sections discuss the data and chapter concludes and their defined, with by a policy implications. the decomposition analysis summary of the main results |