| OCR Text |
Show 10 about local conditions. It is local conditions (in that elected local officials argued are better informed about terms of preferences of citizens and the costs of of particular supply public services) and have the incentives (more than do bureaucrats of the central government) in terms of the knowing decentralization thus provide governments public goods (and thereby discussed an widely sufficiently in the Nevertheless, by the fiscally likely are more similar decisions made the a and politically (hardly to information, as remote central assumption ... government. diversions, and corruption Mookherjee 2000, advantage, as long pp. as preferences preference-revelation case in most are developing 5 reason traditionally given among empirical rise to superior access for decentralization. It is "weaknesses to the same degree evidence in most in to local possible of access developing information and control significant cost-paddling, service centrally appointed bureaucrats" (Bardhan 1-2). Hence, accountability must a and be added to information decentralization involves genuine political autonomy governments. "Locally elected leaders," S"In the through delegation, having do local governments. The bureaucracies have services that local governments that local governments have countries, however, showed that due systems does to reflect the demand for local services of citizens than the central government, imagine of only public to reveal their people perennial problem information does not in itself provide sufficient to to deliver public finance literature). Assuming autonomous both countries), they overcome services. Not public opportunity but it also creates favorable conditions for efficiently, for mix of right World Bank report notes, to local "know their setting of perfect information," Oates observes, "it would obviously be possible for a benevolent planner to prescribe the set of differentiated local outputs that maximizes overall social welfare; there would be no need for fiscal decentralization (although one might wish to describe such an outcome as decentralized in spirit!" (Oates 1999, p. 1123) a central |
