| OCR Text |
Show 143 Table 34: Vertical Functional classification Federal Government Imbalance, 1993/94-1997/98 1993/94 Exp. Exp. 1994/95 1995/96 1996/97 1997/98 4653 5162 5348 5691 6780 2442 3210 3799 4215 4447 7095 8372 9147 9906 11227 3243 5026 5837 6178 6505 696 887 1129 1358 1595 Total Revenue 3939 5913 6966 7536 8100 Vertical Imbalance Other Countries: 0.49 0.61 0.61 0.58 0.50 Regional Total Governments' Exp. Federal Government Revenue Regional Governments' Revenue Average 0.56 Argentina (1995) India (1995) South Africa (1995) Malaysia (1996) Canada (1995) 0.03 0.28 0.88 0.37 0.08 1997/98, and this figure jumps to more than 90 percent if administration of Addis Ababa (Table 33). Three of the smallest states (Afar, Benshangul-Gumuz difference in revenue literature. Table 35 expenditures there is no sources, sources. that state that some were able to was were a expenditure were 2.1 from its were able to finance more able to raise only enough to finance less than 10 Somali, more than 30 often minimal. For percent, resulted own revenue own regional were Although from their spending states the fraction of own sources. expenditure needs of their as The poorest expenditures percent. Such horizontal fiscal imbalance in spending. and those state of a mere able to finance from large portion city underdeveloped regional imbalance, calculated able to meet its cover as Addis Ababa and Dire Dawa, two commercial centers, Gambella) regional is referred to shows the horizontal regional governments regional accounted for Gambella) raising capacity than 50 percent of their and and include the we (Afar, Benshagul-Gumuz example, percent of their the not because its figure for the revenue raising |
