| OCR Text |
Show 4 relationship significant government and the regional between the federal vertical imbalance. This has power, and the fiscal constrained the dependence capacity given regional governments (because the party, or on federal fully exploit to be coherence in present there appears the federal government of regional states of regional states to characterized by states is fiscal enormous government's subsidy their potential. Even has though at between the federal and decision-making coalition of parties, that controls the federal government is also in charge of all regions), the possibility of contradiction in the long run is unavoidable if and when going to inhibit Chapter spending on 5 builds upon the conclusions of education as a case and general responsibility the as a case to attain in study to show Chapters These contradictions the program implementation in 3 and 4 and takes empirically the equitable development. point. First, education particular, There differential are responsible education sector program. Second, the extensive autonomy in terms of federal government, apart from makes two are no for the reasons the is budgetary that education inequality. Applying spending the has on the example, of 87 percent of the of their standards and decisions of objective the increasingly becoming implementation composition setting national of I choose ethnically organized regional governments deciding effort to influence public of the social sector programs in have spending. Indeed, providing a are the lump-sum regional governments. such, the decisions and performance of the regional governments impact are capacity of regional governments under the decentralization program. For regional governments subsidy, fragmented. long-term growth. regional governments education power is political As decisive in the of poverty alleviation and reducing methodology of benefit incidence analysis, Chapter 5 uses |
