| OCR Text |
Show Rose (1 / 20 / 83) page 13 Mr. K Mr. R Mr. K Mr. R Mr. K vania, or New Jersey, well •• . not New Jerse y , you wouldn't ge t away 1 n ~ ' - :: '.:~ with i V, but Pennsylvania, New York, Ill inois. If you can find that situation in any of those states •. Ca lifornia •• and you filed that case there to p~event this kind of practice under those kind of guidelines, then if you ended up with two separate~ circuits in the United States with diverse opinions, then the supreme court has to hear it. It has to make a choice between one or the other because you can't run this country with one area in this country having one law and the other area in the country has two laws. The func-tion of the su~reme court is to establish uniform principles. If we tried that in Utah, we'd end up with two districts. It would be inevitable that we couldn't get it. tf We were talking about bring-ing religious constitutional ~etters in federal court here, and hope we would get Jenkins, Bruce Jenkins, because we'd get the closest thing to a square shake there. Bruce who? Judge Bruce Jenkins. Is he the best one in the area? Is he the best shot at it? He, 1n my op1n1on, 1s the best shot. I don't know that he is the best judge, I mean, I wouldn't say that, but I would think that he is freer of any, even though he ts LDS, he's freer of restrictions by far, in my opinion. I don't think you'd get any place with - / Anderson, and I don't think you'd get anyplace with Windon. If you got anyplace, it would be with Jenkins. When you took on this kind of a case, did you look for prectdent? Did you look back at what had been done in the Jewtsh community before hand? Did you research it? |
