| Title |
Correspondence on Bonneville Unit of Central Utah Project |
| Description |
Correspondence regarding the Bonneville Unit of the Central Utah Project; from the The Dorothy Harvey papers (1902-2005), a collection of materials focusing on the Central Utah Project (CUP), a water resource development program to use Utah's alloted share of the Colorado River. Includes correspondence, federal documents, project litigation materials. |
| Subject |
Central Utah Project. Bonneville Unit; Colorado River Storage Project (U.S.); Ute Indians--Claims; Water resources development--Environmental aspects--Utah; Natural resources--Environmental aspects--Utah; Natural resources--Management--Utah; Strawberry Aqueduct |
| Contributor |
Dominy, Floyd E.; Crow, John O.; Raskin, David C.; McConkie, A. R.; Hayes, Lillian; Hamre, Vern; Ruckel, H. Anthony; Zeller, Henry M.; Black, Kenneth E.; McGuire, John R.; Quarles, John R.; Reed, Nathaniel P.; Lynn, Laurence E.; Jellinek, Steven; Oberhansly, Curtis K.; Horton, Jack O.; Leshy, John D.; McComb, John |
| Additional Information |
Includes: Memo on agreement between the Ute Indian Tribe, Central Utah Water Conservancy District, Bureau of Indian Affairs, and Bureau of Reclamation on deferment of development of Indian lands for irrigation, and other matters; Letters from the Sierra Club, Forest Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, Natural Resources Defense Council; Memos describing government principles and standards for evaluating water projects; Program Decision Option Document, Bonneville Unit - Central Utah Project; Letters between Sierra Club Legal Defense Fund and Curtis Oberhansly regarding Sierra Club, et al. v. Stamm, et al.; Corrections on Transcript of January 30, 1974 Deposition of Assistant Secretary Reed in case of Sierra Club, et al. v. Stamm, et al.; Statement of John McComb in United States District Court for the District of Utah case: Sierra Club, a non-profit California corporation, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Gilbert Stamm, individually and as Commissioner, U. S. Bureau of Reclamation, et al., Defendants |
| Spatial Coverage |
Uintah and Ouray Indian Reservation (Utah); Duchesne River (Utah); Uinta River (Utah); Duchesne (Utah); Colorado River Watershed (Colo.-Mexico); Uinta Mountains (Utah and Wyo.); Green River (Wyo.-Utah); Ashley National Forest (Utah and Wyo.); Uinta National Forest (Utah); Wasatch National Forest (Utah and Wyo.); Salt Lake City (Utah); Strawberry Reservoir (Utah); Utah Lake (Utah); Jordanelle Reservoir (Utah); Provo River (Utah) |
| Collection Number and Name |
Accn2232 Bx118 Fd1; Dorothy Harvey papers |
| Rights Management |
Digital Image © 2010 University of Utah. All Rights Reserved. |
| Holding Institution |
J. Willard Marriott Library, University of Utah |
| Date |
1965; 1972; 1973; 1974 |
| Digitization Specifications |
Original scanned on Epson Expression 10000 XL and saved as 400 ppi TIFF. Display image generated in Contentdm. |
| Publisher |
Digitized by J. Willard Marriott Library, University of Utah |
| Type |
Text |
| ARK |
ark:/87278/s6n58kbp |
| Setname |
wwdl_neh |
| ID |
1155193 |
| Reference URL |
https://collections.lib.utah.edu/ark:/87278/s6n58kbp |
| Title |
Page 183 |
| Setname |
wwdl_neh |
| ID |
1155177 |
| OCR Text |
Show Mr. Andrew F. Walch February 12, 1974 Page 2 I request the attendance of Nathaniel P. Reed, Assistant Secretary for Fish, Wildlife and Parks for the Department of the Interior, at the preliminary injunction hearing, specifically on February 28, 1974. It is my understanding, however, that the United States does not intend to provide Mr. Reed for testimony at the preliminary injunction hearing. This understanding I gained from conversation directly with yourself and Myles Flint at the time of taking Mr. Reed's deposition. I urge you to reconsider your position as stated to me at that time. In the event Mr. Reed is still unavailable as a witness, I shall call Mr. Reed and commence the reading of his deposition into the record. I have set forth below the specific portions of Mr. Reed's deposition we shall read into the record, and I have indicated the deposition exhibits whose admittance into evidence I shall seek. As will be apparent, I have not included all of Mr, Reed's deposition. I reserve the right to enter further portions of Mr. Reed's deposition at future hearings or at the trial proceedings. I seek from you your response regarding what additional parts of the deposition you would like to have us read into the record. Naturally, upon receiving this response, I may well wish to add other parts for the preliminary injunction proceedings. I also urge Mr. Reed's immediate attention to the deposition and his corrections thereof so that all of us, including the court, will have a corrected deposition. The following references encompass those parts of the deposition of Nathaniel P. Reed taken on January 30, 1974, in Washington, D.C. which I shall read into the record as his testimony at the preliminary injunction hearing, assuming he does not appear in court: Reed's Deposition Deposition Exhibits 3 13 4a-e 5 6a & b pag P* P« P-P. P. P« P-P. P-P « P. e 4 line 7 15 1. 19 1. 22 1. 23 1. 28 1. 30 1. 34 1. 36 1. 37 1. 40 1. 41 1. 9 4 17 12 22 18 6 7 1 5 7 - page 9 line 8 third word - 1, 13 - P • AT* x . - p. 24 1. - p. 29 1. - p 34 1. - p. 36 1. 1. - p. 38 1, 1. 1. - p. 18 1. 5 16 through 4th word 21 1 3 19 9 13 14 |
| Reference URL |
https://collections.lib.utah.edu/ark:/87278/s6n58kbp/1155177 |
