| Title |
Correspondence on Bonneville Unit of Central Utah Project |
| Description |
Correspondence regarding the Bonneville Unit of the Central Utah Project; from the The Dorothy Harvey papers (1902-2005), a collection of materials focusing on the Central Utah Project (CUP), a water resource development program to use Utah's alloted share of the Colorado River. Includes correspondence, federal documents, project litigation materials. |
| Subject |
Central Utah Project. Bonneville Unit; Colorado River Storage Project (U.S.); Ute Indians--Claims; Water resources development--Environmental aspects--Utah; Natural resources--Environmental aspects--Utah; Natural resources--Management--Utah; Strawberry Aqueduct |
| Contributor |
Dominy, Floyd E.; Crow, John O.; Raskin, David C.; McConkie, A. R.; Hayes, Lillian; Hamre, Vern; Ruckel, H. Anthony; Zeller, Henry M.; Black, Kenneth E.; McGuire, John R.; Quarles, John R.; Reed, Nathaniel P.; Lynn, Laurence E.; Jellinek, Steven; Oberhansly, Curtis K.; Horton, Jack O.; Leshy, John D.; McComb, John |
| Additional Information |
Includes: Memo on agreement between the Ute Indian Tribe, Central Utah Water Conservancy District, Bureau of Indian Affairs, and Bureau of Reclamation on deferment of development of Indian lands for irrigation, and other matters; Letters from the Sierra Club, Forest Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, Natural Resources Defense Council; Memos describing government principles and standards for evaluating water projects; Program Decision Option Document, Bonneville Unit - Central Utah Project; Letters between Sierra Club Legal Defense Fund and Curtis Oberhansly regarding Sierra Club, et al. v. Stamm, et al.; Corrections on Transcript of January 30, 1974 Deposition of Assistant Secretary Reed in case of Sierra Club, et al. v. Stamm, et al.; Statement of John McComb in United States District Court for the District of Utah case: Sierra Club, a non-profit California corporation, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Gilbert Stamm, individually and as Commissioner, U. S. Bureau of Reclamation, et al., Defendants |
| Spatial Coverage |
Uintah and Ouray Indian Reservation (Utah); Duchesne River (Utah); Uinta River (Utah); Duchesne (Utah); Colorado River Watershed (Colo.-Mexico); Uinta Mountains (Utah and Wyo.); Green River (Wyo.-Utah); Ashley National Forest (Utah and Wyo.); Uinta National Forest (Utah); Wasatch National Forest (Utah and Wyo.); Salt Lake City (Utah); Strawberry Reservoir (Utah); Utah Lake (Utah); Jordanelle Reservoir (Utah); Provo River (Utah) |
| Collection Number and Name |
Accn2232 Bx118 Fd1; Dorothy Harvey papers |
| Rights Management |
Digital Image © 2010 University of Utah. All Rights Reserved. |
| Holding Institution |
J. Willard Marriott Library, University of Utah |
| Date |
1965; 1972; 1973; 1974 |
| Digitization Specifications |
Original scanned on Epson Expression 10000 XL and saved as 400 ppi TIFF. Display image generated in Contentdm. |
| Publisher |
Digitized by J. Willard Marriott Library, University of Utah |
| Type |
Text |
| ARK |
ark:/87278/s6n58kbp |
| Setname |
wwdl_neh |
| ID |
1155193 |
| Reference URL |
https://collections.lib.utah.edu/ark:/87278/s6n58kbp |
| Title |
Page 172 |
| Setname |
wwdl_neh |
| ID |
1155166 |
| OCR Text |
Show # *» SIERRA CLUB LEGAL DEFENSE FUND,INC. by Ansel Adams in This is the American Earth JAMES W. MOORMAN Executive Director BARRY A. FISHER JOHN D. HOFFMAN LAURENS H. SILVER Staff Attorneys, San Francisco H. ANTHONY RUCKEL Staff Attorney, Denver February 5, 1974 Mr. Curtis Oberhansly Twelve Exchange Place Salt Lake City, UT 84111 Re: Central Utah Project Dear Curt: The following paragraphs set forth my ideas regarding our Fish and Wildlife people, more specifically, their depositions. It is my feeling you should set them to be taken fairly soon. The first thing they must give us is the environmental harm to Cur rant" Creek" due to construction of the__damr Their "testimony should h±t_JLmpact of rejucH^i~bT"stream TLow, and, hopefully, it woular~showthat reduction severely^i^gacts the f isheryA^^sjojn^ca.,^ This should be followecTby teslsimonyl-igS impact through use of minimum flows, although I Think it would be wise if we could get testimony tcT~the effect that minimum flows arejust__that, the minimum necessary to'preserve any. kindZof~£Lshery "and do~not~achieve~ the^ previous excellent fishery quality. JfLthe wj^tness^^knows, we would want himJ^JjgjonflrmJtto has been provided below Currant Creek^D"ST^It^^e^witness_dcr^ . iotTTcriow, you may oe able to determine by a check or the LIS as to^whether or notJthe~ information is contained there. If so, it can probably be used with the witness. In addition to stream fishery problems, the witnesses should testify to the impact of inundation_o^J200 plus"acres ot sighiticant wildlife habitat through impounonient~ofthe reservoir behind the dam. The second principal category would appear to me to Jbejbhe harm experienced by the^esE^oF-the streams of the Strawberry AalIeQ^ic^~TysterrirrThis sliouldTobviously, repeat the minimum flow San Francisco: 3 11 California Street, Suite 311, 94104; Telephone (41 5) 398-1411 Denver: 508 Majestic Bldg., 209 16th Street, 80202; Telephone (303) 892-6301 |
| Reference URL |
https://collections.lib.utah.edu/ark:/87278/s6n58kbp/1155166 |