| Title |
Correspondence on Bonneville Unit of Central Utah Project |
| Description |
Correspondence regarding the Bonneville Unit of the Central Utah Project; from the The Dorothy Harvey papers (1902-2005), a collection of materials focusing on the Central Utah Project (CUP), a water resource development program to use Utah's alloted share of the Colorado River. Includes correspondence, federal documents, project litigation materials. |
| Subject |
Central Utah Project. Bonneville Unit; Colorado River Storage Project (U.S.); Ute Indians--Claims; Water resources development--Environmental aspects--Utah; Natural resources--Environmental aspects--Utah; Natural resources--Management--Utah; Strawberry Aqueduct |
| Contributor |
Dominy, Floyd E.; Crow, John O.; Raskin, David C.; McConkie, A. R.; Hayes, Lillian; Hamre, Vern; Ruckel, H. Anthony; Zeller, Henry M.; Black, Kenneth E.; McGuire, John R.; Quarles, John R.; Reed, Nathaniel P.; Lynn, Laurence E.; Jellinek, Steven; Oberhansly, Curtis K.; Horton, Jack O.; Leshy, John D.; McComb, John |
| Additional Information |
Includes: Memo on agreement between the Ute Indian Tribe, Central Utah Water Conservancy District, Bureau of Indian Affairs, and Bureau of Reclamation on deferment of development of Indian lands for irrigation, and other matters; Letters from the Sierra Club, Forest Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, Natural Resources Defense Council; Memos describing government principles and standards for evaluating water projects; Program Decision Option Document, Bonneville Unit - Central Utah Project; Letters between Sierra Club Legal Defense Fund and Curtis Oberhansly regarding Sierra Club, et al. v. Stamm, et al.; Corrections on Transcript of January 30, 1974 Deposition of Assistant Secretary Reed in case of Sierra Club, et al. v. Stamm, et al.; Statement of John McComb in United States District Court for the District of Utah case: Sierra Club, a non-profit California corporation, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Gilbert Stamm, individually and as Commissioner, U. S. Bureau of Reclamation, et al., Defendants |
| Spatial Coverage |
Uintah and Ouray Indian Reservation (Utah); Duchesne River (Utah); Uinta River (Utah); Duchesne (Utah); Colorado River Watershed (Colo.-Mexico); Uinta Mountains (Utah and Wyo.); Green River (Wyo.-Utah); Ashley National Forest (Utah and Wyo.); Uinta National Forest (Utah); Wasatch National Forest (Utah and Wyo.); Salt Lake City (Utah); Strawberry Reservoir (Utah); Utah Lake (Utah); Jordanelle Reservoir (Utah); Provo River (Utah) |
| Collection Number and Name |
Accn2232 Bx118 Fd1; Dorothy Harvey papers |
| Rights Management |
Digital Image © 2010 University of Utah. All Rights Reserved. |
| Holding Institution |
J. Willard Marriott Library, University of Utah |
| Date |
1965; 1972; 1973; 1974 |
| Digitization Specifications |
Original scanned on Epson Expression 10000 XL and saved as 400 ppi TIFF. Display image generated in Contentdm. |
| Publisher |
Digitized by J. Willard Marriott Library, University of Utah |
| Type |
Text |
| ARK |
ark:/87278/s6n58kbp |
| Setname |
wwdl_neh |
| ID |
1155193 |
| Reference URL |
https://collections.lib.utah.edu/ark:/87278/s6n58kbp |
| Title |
Page 5 |
| Setname |
wwdl_neh |
| ID |
1154999 |
| OCR Text |
Show It can reasonably be expected that demands' for water will* exert pressures for the development of the ultimate phase of the Central uxaa £TQ3ect. Wivh a progressive and timely construction program xor wiuc project, the Indian needs can be met by the year 2005 or !?5; & f^ indian "eeds are not -e- W the timely construction :L.T^L°*t 5acilltle3^ vater to satisfy Indian requirements could ". come from t.:e^onnevi^e Unit of the Central Utah Project. We regard 2£? ^ n c u - 1 ^ as unlikely, however, caution dictates term contracts f£!? ^^er^sers « -ne Bonneville Unit so approximately 60,000 acre-ieet annually can oe made available to meet the Indian commitment 11 iiecessary. The proposed agreement provides that facilities in connection with u.. Bonneville Unit will be provided under the Colorado River Storage ."°f SL*?* f B^ti?*?4.fcr losses to « * a«d wildlife and recreation r ^ L ^ l - , °ne U te *ndian & i b e- I* ^ recognized that ^7.;:^ l - ^ ?XS° reSUlt f r ° a the a«iHti«ri provided. Ute Tribe representees have discussed the need for facilities of this type S M I t°! SSfeseutatJves of «w Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Z i m ^ r R>"owwg tne discussions the Ute Tribe requested certain " B e n t s aju the Bonaeville Unit plan to pro-ride for mitigation and e.^ncement of fishery benefits within the Ute Indian Reservation. We wish to call your attention particularly to numbered paragraph 9 5 Sf n f f f ! f S i ^ f b y th£ «&*«»«m of the Tribal easiness Lmkttee w f l t o i i ^ ^ f understands -,hat mitigation for the losses of fish, Serbian SrXZV*?-°? r.esour<:es caused by the construction and opera^on of the Centra. Utah Project will be accomplished as follows: , „ A £ J*1 fauja °f.25 ,c-f-s- of water will be provided in. Rock ureeE ak „ae reservation boundary. O T.T_J_ J-. . . Duchesne *>uCi.ieoi.Ae xMu.Wve r. *." " D a C a g e ! a e n 1 : " » » • - r i l i b * established along° the i r t l d i ? ^ S f + ° P e r a t ^ 0 n a n d ^ i n t e n a : l c e o f the recreation, fishery and W^SSTSS? , MidVleV R e 3 e - o i r W t e transferred to 5 j reserved ' & S d W * * ^ ^ p° o 1 v i l i b e maintained, i n t he C- 4. Fishing lakes aggregating approximately 8C0-surfarP . r r - v-m •oe. constructed on Indian land<? «?+« , n o 4 , J " suriace acreo wj.ll |
| Reference URL |
https://collections.lib.utah.edu/ark:/87278/s6n58kbp/1154999 |