Correspondence on Bonneville Unit of Central Utah Project

Page 110

Ujiueci States ucpvsin^nt of the interior J '• . FlSU AND WILDUFE'SERVICE » BUREAU OF SPORT FISHERIES AND WILDLiFE WASHINGTON, D.C. 20240 0 i) 'or Fish and Wildlife and Paries V^° * ^ Memorandum ^o: ; Assistant Secretary vr*«?w«.L./ ^v.* ^^.o** CUAU «jLxcu.iie ana Carles From: Director, Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife $ \l<fc Subject Bonnevme Unit, Central Utah Project, Utah-Analysis o- Program Decision Option Document ^S J , S °M I c t ^ n s r C : L 0 S i n g ^ a n ^ S i S Wh±Qh S U p p ° r t s t h e * * J ^ r e c o r d ed !J 1W * - g g g l l f f ^ ^ WorJc o n - h e ^ l l e c t i o n gvstem and ^ ^ // ' reiori7raj.aoe QufteYT.ywUji.io ur aid Unit". 0L;Lloys--^^X^: r?v. I ix^versibigaamages SH juti S B S g TTOg^tTTe^uTrSgb, c--- • 6A^ ^ P g g g ggjgggg I ' e a t u T e T f e t ^ ^ n F - c c ^ ^ ^ ^ '" another feature. ~a~~z s-«JL_^ o < 2# n-^-Up ^ S t 0 r i ° r TaGk F o ^ ° C0^°Ged of Beclamtion, BSFW, O f f i c e ^ Program Development and Budget, and any other inferior agencies with/major interest in the project. 2he . -_.... *a&c force should have/both field and Central Office representation from dach participating agency. This group wouldj£ through a segment by segment review of the project recommending changes i n design, construction, and operation that/frould protect fish and wildlife values and s t i ll optimize the jzfrher values of the project. Enclosure f&Mie{!\ W •j. end. and inc. * * $y ' v^'"AA^r vN- _ ^. : , « ^ y j .... --. ....., , . .