| Title |
Correspondence on Bonneville Unit of Central Utah Project |
| Description |
Correspondence regarding the Bonneville Unit of the Central Utah Project; from the The Dorothy Harvey papers (1902-2005), a collection of materials focusing on the Central Utah Project (CUP), a water resource development program to use Utah's alloted share of the Colorado River. Includes correspondence, federal documents, project litigation materials. |
| Subject |
Central Utah Project. Bonneville Unit; Colorado River Storage Project (U.S.); Ute Indians--Claims; Water resources development--Environmental aspects--Utah; Natural resources--Environmental aspects--Utah; Natural resources--Management--Utah; Strawberry Aqueduct |
| Contributor |
Dominy, Floyd E.; Crow, John O.; Raskin, David C.; McConkie, A. R.; Hayes, Lillian; Hamre, Vern; Ruckel, H. Anthony; Zeller, Henry M.; Black, Kenneth E.; McGuire, John R.; Quarles, John R.; Reed, Nathaniel P.; Lynn, Laurence E.; Jellinek, Steven; Oberhansly, Curtis K.; Horton, Jack O.; Leshy, John D.; McComb, John |
| Additional Information |
Includes: Memo on agreement between the Ute Indian Tribe, Central Utah Water Conservancy District, Bureau of Indian Affairs, and Bureau of Reclamation on deferment of development of Indian lands for irrigation, and other matters; Letters from the Sierra Club, Forest Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, Natural Resources Defense Council; Memos describing government principles and standards for evaluating water projects; Program Decision Option Document, Bonneville Unit - Central Utah Project; Letters between Sierra Club Legal Defense Fund and Curtis Oberhansly regarding Sierra Club, et al. v. Stamm, et al.; Corrections on Transcript of January 30, 1974 Deposition of Assistant Secretary Reed in case of Sierra Club, et al. v. Stamm, et al.; Statement of John McComb in United States District Court for the District of Utah case: Sierra Club, a non-profit California corporation, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Gilbert Stamm, individually and as Commissioner, U. S. Bureau of Reclamation, et al., Defendants |
| Spatial Coverage |
Uintah and Ouray Indian Reservation (Utah); Duchesne River (Utah); Uinta River (Utah); Duchesne (Utah); Colorado River Watershed (Colo.-Mexico); Uinta Mountains (Utah and Wyo.); Green River (Wyo.-Utah); Ashley National Forest (Utah and Wyo.); Uinta National Forest (Utah); Wasatch National Forest (Utah and Wyo.); Salt Lake City (Utah); Strawberry Reservoir (Utah); Utah Lake (Utah); Jordanelle Reservoir (Utah); Provo River (Utah) |
| Collection Number and Name |
Accn2232 Bx118 Fd1; Dorothy Harvey papers |
| Rights Management |
Digital Image © 2010 University of Utah. All Rights Reserved. |
| Holding Institution |
J. Willard Marriott Library, University of Utah |
| Date |
1965; 1972; 1973; 1974 |
| Digitization Specifications |
Original scanned on Epson Expression 10000 XL and saved as 400 ppi TIFF. Display image generated in Contentdm. |
| Publisher |
Digitized by J. Willard Marriott Library, University of Utah |
| Type |
Text |
| ARK |
ark:/87278/s6n58kbp |
| Setname |
wwdl_neh |
| ID |
1155193 |
| Reference URL |
https://collections.lib.utah.edu/ark:/87278/s6n58kbp |
| Title |
Page 176 |
| Setname |
wwdl_neh |
| ID |
1155170 |
| OCR Text |
Show 2-7-74 CORRECTIONS ON TRANSCRIPT OF JANUARY 30, 1Q7A ^ ^ ^ T O M OF ASSISTANT SECRETARY REED Page 6 6 r ^ 6 -6 x 6 . 6 " 6 7 ^ /7 / 7 x 7 „ 8 I 8 . 9 - 9 „ 9 x 10 * 10 /10 > 1 0 .10 . 10 ^ 10 «> 10 Line 10 11 13 15 17 18 19 6 9 14 15 21 22 .4 5 7 2 4 8 9 10 11 18 19 Sierra Club, et al. v. Stamm, et al. SHOULD READ AS FOLLOWS: A. I have three line agencies, Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife, the National Park Service and the Bureau agencies. I am responsible for testifying before Congress the programs. I philosophically carry out the mandate and operation of these programs. I guess the majority of my effort is spent in reaching departmental decisions representing the environmental quality aspect of the Department vation, protection and management. Philosophically, quality as humanly possible on all far-reaching management decisions. word but it is the Assistant Secretary who is looked to to either kill a project or make the project A. We are to fully comment, and participate in all major Federal actio: under the Coordination Act. We prepare input from go, or whether a project needs to be significantly modified. During the draft we have input into the draft and draft in a critical style that is frank and open and under-the Secretary, Reflecting for a minute on the way former Secretaries Udall the way Secretary Morton runs the Department, of the Interior. an Under Secretary first Dr. William Pecora and now John Whitaker, to attempt to minimize the disputes that reach his desk. If those disputes are unavoidable, to at least get them down into understandable language and pinpoint the differences. A. Signing off isya process. Before a signature goes on the document, it must be carefully reviewed, and all departmental |
| Reference URL |
https://collections.lib.utah.edu/ark:/87278/s6n58kbp/1155170 |
