Contents | 244 of 266

Page 244

Request Archival File or Update Item Information
Title Remarks on the principal acts of the Thirteenth Parliament of Great Britain : Volume I, containing remarks on the acts relating to the colonies, with a plan of reconciliation.
Call Number E211 L75; Record ID 9941400102001
Date 1781
Description This volume contains remarks on the acts relating to the American colonies ("the Intolerable Acts"), with a plan of reconciliation. Samuel Parr praised this work as a defence of the British case against the colonists, and Bentham claimed to have made its outline.
Creator Lind, John, 1737-1781
Subject Great Britain--Parliament--1768-1774; Great Britain--Politics and government--1760-1820; United States--Politics and government--1775-1783
Type Text
Format application/pdf
Identifier E211-L75.pdf
Language eng
Spatial Coverage Great Britain; United States
Rights Management http://rightsstatements.org/page/NoC-US/1.0/
Holding Institution J. Willard Marriott Library, University of Utah
Scanning Technician Ellen Moffatt
Digitization Specifications Original scanned with Hasselblad H6D 50c medium format DSLR and saved as 800 ppi tiffs. Display images created in Adobe Photoshop Lightroom CC and generated in Adobe Acrobat DC as multiple page pdf.
Contributing Institution J. Willard Marriott Library, University of Utah
ARK ark:/87278/s6k68j83
Setname uum_rbc
ID 1310186
Reference URL https://collections.lib.utah.edu/ark:/87278/s6k68j83

Page Metadata

Title Page 244
OCR Text Se&.VlII. 460 ACTS RELATING Partllh To THE COLONIES. 46m cal/II are of no ufe, no validity in this all ecclehaftieal catifes, which, like all our other courts, {honld have {at and aet- cafe. ed in the name, and by the authority of The religious principle can never fil/l/Mc' to any act, by which that plenitude the king. lt fhould have guarded thefe provifions by pains and penalties clearly exprefl‘ed, and eaiiy to he inflic‘ted. As the of pow r is acknowledged to be circum- feribable. at}: now fiands, how is the Canadian to know what is the iiipz‘emacy to which he have force {tiflieient to bind a firm believer in the plenitnde of power in the z'/2~ o iIere then tie a& fliould have been more explicit; it lhould plainly have den is ftti)jc€t, or what are the penalties under which he is to fubmit to it ? He is to find premacy. it out, if he can, in the firft of Elizabeth, :1 fiatnte which is a repeal, or a revivor or on any pretence whatever: it {houll of no lefs than fixteen other fiatutes, which itfclf has been altered, and in part repeal- have ef'tabliihed courts for the decifion of ed by eight or ten later flatutes. fined What was meant by the king's fu- It {hould have prohibited all appeals to the court of Rome in any canfie " ever to the contrary." The member who brought in this oath mutt, one {hould think, have known, that whoever was {launch papilt enough to believe the pope has the power of difpenling with obedience to the oat/2, mutt believe too, that he had power enough to difpenfc with the Immuni- atz'gu. And it feems, therefore, injudicious in the A lla- tute, therefore, which we may venture to lay, not one Englifhman in a thoulhnd underfiands, which, therefore, it cannot be reaionahle to expect the Canadians {honld ever underfland. The celibacy of the Roman clergy is another point, in which the welfare of lesiflature, to let the Canadians fee, that it even fuppofed it pollible they {hould be capable of holding a tenet which would deltroy the. {anftion of all oaths. If, indeed, the fanflion of an oath be of that ufe it is generally l'uppofed to be, all the civil fociety is more deeply interefied than many nay at firl‘t light imagine. Men
Format application/pdf
Setname uum_rbc
ID 1310430
Reference URL https://collections.lib.utah.edu/ark:/87278/s6k68j83/1310430