| OCR Text |
220 ACTS RELATING To 'rne COLONIES. Part1}. " avoided."-lf there be fireh emphafis in thefe words, that the avoiding them every where was matter of detign; here then We cannot help concluding they were [urcmeditate/y u/é'd. N0, fays the fame gentleman. For lool; at the title of the aft. If the title of the aft, indeed, had purported taxation, it would have been quite a (inherent affair. But " the title of this a&, notwithfianding " the words of donation, eonfiders it " merely as :1 regulation of trade."-So then parliament is at liberty to be as bountiful as it planes in mi}; of donation, out of the goods of the Americans, provided 2:1 " his majelly's colonies and plantations in "‘ America." But farther-" This not" (we are told) "‘ was made on It c‘a;;¢7‘072.f/& of all; and " at the L').:l/}7‘t"/.l (555m of awe of the colon nice. It v as therefore in forne meafure"-- marl; the COX]lqu‘.CDCC---" with 22";le cm"‘/I'{'/z/."---It was then with i/zuir content, that the commons-did Whit P-gaw and maimed, one {honld fuppofe, Ct duty to be levied on the eolonii‘ts.---No lays this 0 (:4 V" ‘ _‘ ‘ 1 gentleman, tnougn there was an (1.1 of do - 1121ii0n-~Cl1011gl1[llCl'C were the term: of donation; flill it was 729 donation. For "it " was an nit of prohibition, not of‘reveo it do not Life terms of d nation: or it may even me term: of donation in the prean‘i- " nue."----i§hould we fulpeit the accuracy of this honourable writer, we are referred ble, or in the body of the aft, provide: the title of it, be a title of regulation-So to " the feeOnd printed letter of Governor then the Hump mft would have been good, and eonf'titntional, provided Mr. Grenville had bethought hiinfelf tointitle it " an tuft " to regulate the tray ,' 2' 1 " Bernard, dated in 1763," This care to marl; the date of the letter, was " I 2‘fix};efreixzc'dz'tused."---lt was meant ,, a ,~ > ~ to inhnuzite, that gowuior Lernaid, t/m, - asV an a'it r, 7 a d it ' the 3111*; r763, wondere 11.1 01' |
