| Title |
Strawberry Aqueduct and Collection System, Bonneville Unit, Central Utah Project: documents and correspondence, 1979 |
| Description |
From the The Dorothy Harvey papers (1902-2005), a collection of materials focusing on the Central Utah Project (CUP), a water resource development program to use Utah's alloted share of the Colorado River. Includes correspondence, Harvey's writing drafts and notes for an unpublished book on the CUP, federal documents, project litigation materials, subject files, news clippings, newsletters, programs, brochures, and maps |
| Subject |
Central Utah Project; Strawberry Aqueduct; Wildlife conservation--Utah--Uinta Basin; Rivers--Environmental aspects--Utah; Water resources development --Environmental aspects--Utah; Wetlands--Utah; Ute Indians--Claims; Water-supply--Utah--Salt Lake County |
| Creator |
Harvey, Dorothy |
| Contributor |
Citizens for a Responsible Central Utah Project |
| Alternate Title |
Environmental Assessment of the Terrestrial Wildlife Mitigation Plan for the Strawberry Aqueduct and Collection System, Bonneville Unit, Central Utah Project; Strawberry Collection System wildlife mitigation; Utah Lake (Utah) |
| Additional Information |
Includes questionnaire dated Aug. 28, 1978, about Central Utah Project costs; Bureau of Reclamation Environmental Assessment of the Terrestrial Wildlife Mitigation Plan for the Strawberry Aqueduct and Collection System, Bonneville Unit, Central Utah Project, April 1979; Strawberry Collection System wildlife mitigation: Fact Sheet 5, Feb. 1979; Correspondence from D. Harvey to CRCUP members, federal and state officials, and others |
| Spatial Coverage |
Colorado River Basin (Colo.-Mexico); Uinta Basin (Utah and Colo.); Uinta Mountains (Utah); Rock Creek (Duchesne County, Utah); Jordanelle Reservoir (Utah); Salt Lake County (Utah); Duchesne County (Utah) |
| Collection Number and Name |
Accn2232 bx 57 fd 4; Dorothy Harvey papers |
| Rights Management |
Digital Image © 2010 University of Utah. All Rights Reserved. |
| Holding Institution |
J. Willard Marriott Library, University of Utah |
| Date |
1978; 1979 |
| Digitization Specifications |
Original scanned on Epson Expression 10000 XL and saved as 400 ppi TIFF. Display image generated in Contentdm. |
| Publisher |
Digitized by J. Willard Marriott Library, University of Utah |
| Type |
Text |
| ARK |
ark:/87278/s6v69hj4 |
| Setname |
wwdl_neh |
| ID |
1151130 |
| Reference URL |
https://collections.lib.utah.edu/ark:/87278/s6v69hj4 |
| Title |
Page 6 |
| Setname |
wwdl_neh |
| ID |
1150986 |
| OCR Text |
Show 3. N. Opportunity Costs Please detail these. Attached to this letter are items we have listed as being appropriate, and sources for recommendations, i.e., water studies, economic analysis, and in consultation v/ith legal and amenity resource experts such as John Krutilla "The Economics of Natural Resources", Resources for the Future publication. We have'included commentary related to the subject and the issues in Utah in this Appendix A. 0» Recreational Development Costs We feel that for several reasons, these costs are part of the cost to the taxpayer for each acre foot of water developed. First: Although they are not mitigation in kind, these recreational sites on the new reservoirs have been touted as a partial mitigation measure. Second: They are used to build public support for Reclamation Projects. Third: Their development has not been entered into in open, objective and cooperative discussions with the agencies managing public lands and wildlife. The Forest Service has long opposed reservoir development in both Rock Creek and Whiterocks Canyons in the interests of protecting outstanding stream and canyon recreation values adjacent to high country wilderness areas. The Utah Division of Wildlife Resources and the Forest Service, through the Fish and Wildlife Service, have emphatically and persistently advocated the protection of Uinta Range and other northeast Utah wild streams, their fisheries and riparian values, since the early 19 50's - in vain! Studies have indicated that Utah has a surplus already of flatwater recreation facilities". Thus a massive investment In additional flatwater recreational facilities would not be the choice of most recreational planners in investing funds in recreational development in Utah. (Additional commentary on the value of trout streams in Utah - free flowing streams - is provided under Mitigation Costs and Opportunity Costs) *Studies on population trends for the Colorado River Basin - state that .there is no projected need for more reservoir fishing until the year 2,020! |
| Reference URL |
https://collections.lib.utah.edu/ark:/87278/s6v69hj4/1150986 |