OCR Text |
Show ....... . ·. ... .... . • '. ... 'n1 E M N 0 G·~·N IS T S AND comes in to shod light upon tho very cradle of humanity, and to consecrate the mcmol'y of g ncraLions loner since oncrulphcd in the quicl san Is of time." Thus much is certainly wiLltin tho comp LC11cy of "philology;" and we may concede to it nh;o Lhc faculty, wlwrc the historic clements for comparison exi t-as in tho range of' Indo-germanic, ScmiLic, and some few other well-studied crroups of tonguesof asccdainino- relationships of inte1·cou1·Be between wid ly-sopnrat,e famili •s of man; but not always, as it is fashionable now to claim, und which I will presently show to bo abstml, of a community of oricriu bctw en two given races physiolocrically and geographically di~tin ·t. Arrain, no tongue is pcrman nt. More than 150 yon1·s ago, Rtehard 13 ntl y, perhaps tho groat st critic o{ his ag ,480 exemplified this axiom wl1ilc unmasking tho Gro k forgeries of .A.lcxand1·ian sophi~ts. '.'~very living language, like tho pcl·~pit·ing bodies of Jiving creatures, 1s 1n porp Lual motion aud alteration ; some words go oil~ and become obsoloLo; others Me taken in, and by degrees grow into common usc; or th same word is inverted in a new l:lensc and 11otion whi •h in t.1·act of time makes as observable a ·hango iH tl1c air and feaLurcs of a ]auguacrc, as ago makes in the lines and mien of a face. All arcs nsiblc ofthis in th it· own native tongues, wlloro contiuual use mak sa man a Cl'itic." But, at j,he same time that tl1is is the la~ <l ~uced from tho hi 'Lorical evidences of wriLLon lm1gnao·es, its actiOn 1s enormously ace lcmLod amoncr pctLy bm·bar us tribes such as a few Asiatic, many Aft·ican, several American, and still' more ft· qucntly among tho Malayan, and Occani o-Australian ntcos. Here, met·o linguistic lancl-mal'ks arc as often completely o·mwed as re-ostalJlishod; while the typicrtl characteristics of tho l'!tce endure, and tlJcrcforc can alone s rve as bases for etllnic classificaLion. Yet we read very day in som shape or other: "The decision. of the A ademy (of St. Pctcrsbur , 40 yca1·s ago) was, .h~wcver, qUJto unreserved upon this point; fol' it maintains its conv~ctwn, after a long rosoar ·h, tlutt alllangua.r;eB are to be considered aB dwlectB (of one) now loBt." 491 'l'his enunciation of an eminent Car<linal, althouO'h dating some 20 years back, is sLill gnotcd and rc.-quotc<l by thankfnl imb cility which, on any other point of doctl'l~ , would shudder at Hornanist authority. And ito,' it s If om ric sm1l s among those who happen to know the estimation in which Egyptol.ogists now ~told M. de Goulianofl"s A1·clu!ologie egyptienne and Acrolog~e, to sec h~s report to the Russian Acauemy used as a doo-maticul :finality to further linguistic adv::wcem nt! Iu Eugland }~e ' 86 Di~m·tation~ upon tiLe Epistlet of l'lialaris, Themi8tocles, Socrates Euripides and upon the Fa!~et of ./E'sop (I GOO); Dyco's ou., London, 8vo, 183(); IJ, p. 1. ' ' WISEMAN, Oon1uctio1l, &c., 2d cu., 8vo, London, 1842; pp. GB-9. T ID; P 0 L Y G l~ N I S T S . [)71 has h en su ceod (I by a school which discards tho term "race" altogether; bccaus its Oracle, after an amazing number of contradictory pl'opositions, has latterly stat, d 488 how" he believes that al l the varieties of man Me referable to a single species," as pe1· catalogue, Luke Durko judiciously comments, of barbarian vocabularieB. One recipe, f( L' atLaining expeditiously a conclusion so d vontly wished, is si mplc enough. It is the following: -1st, to start, with Icing James's version of GenesiB, Chapter IV, verse 25 :-2d, to jnrnp over 4730 y at·s tl1at an Archbishop says have elapsed from that day to this, and tak the population descended from "Adam and Eve" to be now exactly 1,21G,G70,000 :489-3d, to invent a sort of fmmo-work (say " scritoirc") containing precisely 9 pigeon-hol s :-4th, to label them MonoByllabic, Turanian, Oaucasian (alias Dioscurian, said to be the ·amo thino'), Persian, Indian, Oceanic, Ame1"ican, Aj1·ican, and Ew·op(!an:- 5th, clisr garcling such trifics as history, anatomy, or physiological distinctions, to squeeze all lmmanity, "as per vocabulary," into tl1CHO D compartmonts:-Gth, to chant "to Deum" over the whole }JOrlcnmanec;-and lastly, 7th, to baptize as infidelB those who disbelieve th u unity of' tho human species" to bo proved by any such ltocus-pocus, or at·bitrary methods of establishing that of which Sci nco, at tho present day, owing to insufficiency of materials, humbly ·onfc scs hot'self to be ignorant; whilst she indignantly repudiat, s, as impcttin nt and mendacious, the suppression of all facLt; that <trc too thl'oo-comered to be jammed into tho 9 pigeon-holes aforesaid. Such, in sober sadness, is tho effect pro<luccd upon tho minds of unLiasscd anthropologists, by this unscientific system. '!'boy canuot, fin· tho lifo of them, as coucorns real ethnology, whot·o tho thcologor sees in each of these 9 pigeon-holes a wondr·ous "confit·nHttion," perc ivc in the whole arrangement anything more than a reflex: of the. mind of th iring nious inventor. What true philological science has achieved, in the 6th year after the middle of our XL'<:th century, may be studied in M. Alfl'cd Mamy's Chaplet· I of this volume. Its l'esults do not appear to iavor monogonistic theories of human langung. It is with tho express object of avoiding this, or any other umHtLul'al 8ystem, that 1ny "Ethnographic 'l'ableau" bas boon prepal'ed. ~l'ypographi ·al exigencies compel an appearance, I must.all.ow, of arb1Lra.ry classification : but no dofiniLivo bat· to progress JS mtenl1cd by 1ts at'rangemcnt; and I shall be proud to follow any b:L.ter that imparti~l jnquirics into Nature's lawl:! may in tho future cltCit. Such as thts ~ 88 ];ondon Atltcncvum, Juno 17, 1854. · 480 RAnNS'l'BJN, Descriptive Notes, und Etlinograpltical Map of tiLe World, London, 1854; PP· 2-4. |