| OCR Text |
Show The State proposal and Forest Service proposal Number 1 goes north of the Guard Station and' would put the Guard Station belm.; the road. If either of thesE\.locations aI'e used a portion of the old road wul have .to be us ed for access. This will require a certain amount of maintenance. ' If Forest Service proposal number 3 is used, the extra maintenance (>lill not be required as access to the station vlill be as i t is at ' IDresent. This proposal w-i.-.ll require the movi ng of t irJO small sheds to the l<Jest of the station. (see map). If Forest Service proposal No . 2 is used j:.l:€ present guard station site will be destroyed and all moveable buildings }:d.ll have to be moved to the nevI proposed site. The guard station and bunkhouse cannot be moved due to structure of these buildings~ The State proposed right-of-1--iay cuts the Ad..ministrative site into parts and "JOulctel:Lliinate one of the mqst productive, and at present , the only irrigable part of the pastw;e. t~lO ForestServ~ice proposal No. 1 and 3 (see map) ..wuld lessen the impact on the Administrative site, i-iith proposed location number 3 havLng the least impact on resource manag ement. Forest Service proposal No. 3 Hould take a certaLl1 amount of productive land but would not be as serious as the State proposal. . Forest Service proposal number 1 1-wuld have to be located far enough . back on the bench abcve the guard station compl ex so that public traveling would not be looking directly down on the Guard Station, thereby detract from what esthetics the site has to offer. No coordination is needed except that Hhich is described under operations. Timber No cOITJriercial ti;110 er is involve d on the project. is needed. No coordination Fire Control No coordination is needed. Recreation No coordiP..a tion is needed except tt.6. t Hhich is described under operations. |
