OCR Text |
Show Many diking proposals and studies have not demonstrated a benefit to the lake or the ecosystem and have posed more damage to other resource extraction industries than is economically justified. Impacts on wildlife ( brine shrimp populations) and tourism ( problem beaches) have not been figured into the economic calculations of causeways and extractive industry so far. An assessment of many issues must be required, off site impacts and the effect on optimal productivity should be accurately addressed. Diking should be evaluated on a case- by- case basis with a strong emphasis on avoiding or minimizing the use of dikes to manage the lake or to protect infrastructure. Remove at- risk structures to a safe location and do not permit infrastructure where it might subsequently require protection. The intent of the proposed diking policy is to provide assessments of impacts for consideration in the permitting process. Ecosystem- related impacts will be considered. The preferred alternative would require assessment of wetland, wildlife habitat, lake level, water quality, navigation and other management impacts for diking proposals on DNR lands. This would include cumulative impact assessment. The adverse impacts of previous diking are evident, but not all impacts are negative. Even though the salinity of Farmington Bay and Bear River Bay is affected by dikes and causeways, the habitats which have resulted and their use by wildlife are very beneficial. Further economic analysis is planned and efforts are made to utilize all practical knowledge when making resource decisions. On other lands, infrastructure siting and building permits are the responsibility of local government. DNR's influence on other lands will be limited to review and comment if given the opportunity. 6.5 Other land topics There are significant archeological sites on the west side of the lake. Will these sites be protected? Archeological sites beyond the meander line are outside the scope of this planning effort but may be considered in future coordination. The state should buy Fremont Island or it could be bought by out- of- state or foreign interests. The state appreciates notice of the likely sale of Fremont Island. Given legislative and administrative constraints on land acquisition, DNR has developed criteria for acquisitions. At this time, Fremont Island does not satisfy enough of the criteria to warrant acquisition. 309 |