| OCR Text |
Show 111 Recreation and Tourism - Land Current Situation ( CS) Alternative A Alternative B Alternative C 9.2 Improve recreational opportunities and access. Feasibility/ Efl Fcctiveness Few additional resources Additional resources required. Same as A, except Would not respond to increasing required. Cost effective Effective in meeting public feasibility of a circumpublic demand. No additional management strategy. Funding recreation demands. Funding navigation route would be resources required. partnerships required. partnerships encouraged with user groups and other agencies. Strategy required. questionable because of agreements with outside parties and lack of funding. Strategy required. Possible Impa rts Minimal impacts on GSL Some potential increase in Same as A, plus additional Otherwise, no additional ecosystem ecosystems especially if ecosystem impacts. Would require transportation related impacts. Potential for increased monitoring is ensured. Provides adequate monitoring. Provides impacts on the ecosystem. impacts on existing recreation and additional access and additional access and recreational Would require significant access resources. recreational opportunities. opportunities. Requires law enforcement. monitoring. Provides more recreational and access opportunities on the W side of GSL. Conflicts/ Cool rdiiiation Could create some user conflicts. Potential increase in trespassing. Same as A, plus more Significant conflicts in not being able Requires DNR coordination Conflict between recreation user coordination with UDOT to meet user demands. Puts more between AISP, WMAs, groups and preservationists. and user groups. The demands on existing resources. URMCC and recreation user Require more proactive DNR role number of trespass groups. in providing recreation opportunities. Extensive coordination with state, local government, landowners, user groups. incidents on the military range and private property may increase. 198 |
