OCR Text |
Show 6. Land Current Situation ( CS) Alternative A Alternative B Alternative ill 6.4 GSL diking policy Feasibility/ Effectiveness Currently decided on a case- by- case basis and depends primarily on the purpose of the diking proposal. Project proponents may incur additional costs. Same as A. Same as CS. Possible Impacts Effect of dikes on wildlife, habitat, shoreline fluctuations and depth and navigation is not always evaluated. Effect of dikes on wildlife, habitat, shoreline fluctuations, water depth and navigation would be always evaluated. Same as A. Same as CS. Conflicts/ Coordination COE is the primary regulator and has concerns about GSL diking. State will be more closely scrutinized in regard to diking related management actions. Extensive coordination with COE required. DNR would take a more active role in evaluating diking proposals, especially as they relate to navigation. Same as A. Same as CS. Public Trust/ Protection Possible long- term adverse consequences for shoreline habitat and GSL ecosystem dynamics. Navigation remains difficult. Provides the highest level of public trust resource protection. Possible opportunity for synergism between federal, state and local government. Potential for navigation to improve on GSL. Same as A. Same as CS. 191 |