OCR Text |
Show All of the 23- 21- 5 lands should become WMAs. The state should formally protect more wildlife habitat with wildlife primacy for the 39 townships. Multiple- use does not necessarily need to be ruled out if the state holds optimal biological productivity as apriority. Wildlife and habitat should take primacy over other multiple uses which advocates formal protection of additional habitat. There are many significant high value wetlands below meander line that are not currently associated with state WMAs, BRMBR or other specially designated areas. These wetlands need consideration and protection in the planning process. The state should take an active role in county wetland planning and make a commitment to help fulfill their wetland protection goals. DWR and the GSLEP will coordinate an effort to examine wildlife values of lands identified within these 39 townships. A formal recommendation will be made to the Wildlife Board regarding designation. Many acres of valuable wildlife habitat around the lake currently are not included in WMAs, the BRMBR or other areas of special designation. Alternative 6.1 addresses a mechanism to recognize more of these important habitats, especially those around the east side of the lake which have tremendous wildlife value. 5.2 Other biology topics Why is the brine shrimp harvesting COR revision process going through the RAC process rather than being considered within this planning process? The Utah Wildlife Board has the legal authority to set policy for DWR and issue rules and proclamations which govern the issuing of CORs and rules which govern the harvesting of brine shrimp. This plan is intended to coordinate management activities of DNR divisions and provide for a collaborative process to ensure sound management decisions are made to protect the lake. The plan and the process cannot supersede the legally required mandates of the divisions and their boards. Therefore such issues as COR distribution, harvesting season opening/ closing and COR fees are legally addressed by the Utah Wildlife Board. Why would the team not designate certain areas on the west side of the lake as protected? If we are looking at the whole GSL ecosystem, protecting the east side and not the west does not make any sense. Could the west side become more ecological productive with a different salinity regime? The Legislature defined what lands could be considered for special wildlife uses. Other lands around the lake are available for multiple uses. Wildlife will be given consideration during the planning and permitting of development activities. Wildlife impacts will be avoided or mitigated where possible. Consider supporting the creation of the South Shore Wetlands Ecological Reserve of GSL by helping restore freshwater inflow to the delta of the Jordan River. 302 |