| OCR Text |
Show 93 the AFT and the NEA.47 The tone of the article suggested that the professional association movement--not the union movement--would still solve the same problems facing teachers. school year the UEA would utilize walkout. 48 On May 16, during the It is ironic that a union-style tactic--the 1964, the UEA declared that due to the further inaction of the Governor, the Utah teachers would not report for duty a on May 18 and 19 of drastic action 1964.49 Part of the that it would draw attention to the was schools and to the determination of which wanted to do something about accomplished these reasoning behind such two a united teachers' it.50 The walkout plight of the organization certainly objectives, for the UEA received of attention and the teachers did appear to be united. a great deal this In fact, time, after listening to the UEA appeal again for sanctions, the NEA granted the request. point in the UEA, 4711The Educational 48The 51 and Observers believe that this even in the NEA since it was was the turning the first time Road to Success is Always Under Construction,1I Utah Review 57 (September-October 1963): 6-7. -- UEA went to great pains to explain that the walkout was not a strike since the time of duration was announced in advance and For an example of since the teachers offered to make up the time. the efforts to explain, see "Thanksgiving Came Early this Year,1I Utah Educational Review 58 (September-October 1964): 7. 49U.E.A. Resolution for Action, Resolution #1 Utah Educational Association, 16 May 1964). (Salt Lake 50Ibid. City: However, there were some UEA members who reported for duty and a few district associations which did not support the walkout. See Deseret News 20 May 1964, p. A-1. 51 t I' "One Can t Bathe in the Same Ri ver Twi ce.o Also, for I' see account of the support and opposition to the "recess, 176-185 of pp. Morgan. an |
