| OCR Text |
Show 92 larger appropriations did Even the NEA did not sanctions because it considered the find is a refused to fully support the UEA and sort tactic and believed that all policy of sanctions zation, the NEA, was as last a exhausted.45 re to This because it became apparent that the UEA was demonstra ting tendencies which This impose possible methods in attempting solution to the Utah problem had not been significant tactics.44 not approve the new UEA pressure a was were more ready to radical than those its parent organi accept. difficult time for teachers in Utah because it was apparent that the "old professionalism" along with study committees appointed by the Governor were not delivering the desired results. Yet, the UEA could not muster full NEA backing. discouraged, but nevertheless, in an The UEA was obviously editorial designed to encourage teacher.s, the Review editors said: Now the weeks ahead are crucial. Remember, if you think Those who brood about disaster, you will probably get it. On the other hand, about death probably hasten their demise. if you think positively and masterfully, with confidence and fa i th, 1 i fe us ua 11 y becomes more secure, more frought wi th UEA will be in action, richer in achievement and experience. touch with you at least once a week by mail. In the meantime, remember that this really isn't such a bad old world after all, once you get used to being nervous about everything.46 beginning of the 1963-64 school year, the UEA published At the an article in the Review which dealt with the differences between· 44For been detailed account of the defections of those who had sympathetic to the UEA cause, see Morgan, pp. 59-66! 45110ne Review 57 a Can't Bathe in the Same River Twice," Utah Educational (May-June 1964): 7. 4611Ingredients 56 (May 1963): 7. of Success--A Dream," Utah Educational Review |
