| OCR Text |
Show 27 nation as whole did not associate such things a negotiations with a tiations are "compatible with profession.1I18 negotiations The NEA school or or 1960, the NEA Delegate Assembly the ethics and not the term representatives dignity was thought were negotiations.20 same Associations In 1962, the NEA still thing as did not "insisting.1I19 IIprofessional negotiations" the used, determining policies of began "demanding" and but it term in nego- of the "negotiationsll participate to to boards and teachers. began using the boards strikes and held in various parts of the country. negotiate collective were a were concern the term use Whether calling for the right common In resolution which in effect said that rejected were teachers.17 as which many collective bargaining It was not until 1968 that negotiations actually called negotiations and the NEA began sounding like union. One commentator, J. Douglas Muir, told the school board members of the nation that: NEA has shed its image of a sisterhood of spinster teachers and has come alive to the will of its members, 80 percent of whom are teachers, a group that is getting_younger and bigger all the time.21 171n a 1953 study, one respondent revealed his conception of striking when he was asked if teachers should strike. His reply was "We 11, it a 11 depends on what the chi 1 d has done. See Frederi ck Terri en, "Who Th inks What About Educators, Ameri can Journal of Sociology 59 (September 1953): 154. II II 18Carlton and Goodwin, p. 36. 191bi'd. 20Stanley M. eds., Readings on (Chicago: Elam, Myron Leiberman, and Michael H. Moskow, Collective Negotiations in Public Education Rand McNally, 1967), p. 198. 21Carlton and Goodwin, p. 35. |
