| OCR Text |
Show 91 and better working conditions for teachers. The Revolutionary Period In 1963, Governor-appointed committee consisting of repre a sentatives from various Cooperating Agencies legislation which was parties involved with education, called for Public Schools acceptable tially increased emphasis leadership thought when the committee's was to the UEA because of the substan school expenditures.42 The UEA that most of the recommendations would be considered by the State the UEA on recommended school (CAPS), Legislature and the proposals did not win faced with deciding whether or Governor. favorably However, approval of the Governor, not to utilize About this time, the NEA had articulated a which said that teachers should refuse to accept new tactics. policy of sanctions positions in other districts when the vacancies have occurred in school systems where the NEA has declared that there has been part of the in 1963, employers.43 the UEA Because of the At this some point, who had been the on opposition of Governor Clyde such sanctions requested that the NEA impose statewide basis. support because "unprofessional activity" the UEA lost some supportive of on a of its in-state the UEA requests for 42See John C. Evans Jr., Utah School Crisis 1963 (Salt Lake City: Deseret News Press, 1963) for an inside view, if slanted, For further discussion of CAPS, see Dallas Dee Morgan, liThe of CAPS. Utah Educational Controversy," CM.S. thesis, University of Utah, 1967}. Part of Morgan's study is devoted to how groups behave when they are in conflict with each other. He traces the CAPS development from its inception 43For a Kappan its demise. analysis of the policy, see "Co l l ect ive Bargain Phi Or Professional Negotiations and Sanctions?1I 44 (October 1962): 1-11. 1962 ing and Strikes? Delta to |
