| OCR Text |
Show 67 editorials. editorials There has been expressed the views of the on as This method of questioned in 1975 after viewpoint was editorial appeared.24 a to whether as official. are the editorial general authorities be considered official. torial confusion in the Church News appearing that the views some page are not It appears representative of whole and therefore might communicating an or Church a anti-Equal Rights Amendment The Church did not say represented absolutely and positively directly that the edi the official Church stand. Yet it did not raise its voice to correct anyone who did say that it represented year and position of the Church.25 by issuing a First amendment Presidency more than statement which made days of Utah, the Deseret News Church.27 sidered an official used an official organ although its editors 2411Equal opposition a question to the official.26 In the territorial as After half of confusion, the Church finally did settle the a proposed the organ of the Mormon Rights Amendment," Church News, are 11 was con Today, it is chosen not carefully. January 1975, p. 16. 25Governor Calvin Rampton stated that he understood the Church News editorial was official. The Church did not deny that it was. See "Right to Oppose ERA,II Deseret News, 22 January 1975, p. 8-B. 26"lDS p. Leaders Oppose ERA," Deseret News, 23 October 1976, A-3. 27See Oeseret News 15 October 1892 for an official declaration to the effect that the Deseret News was the official mouthpiece of the Church. For a study of the content of the Deseret News during the very trying times when the Mormons were trying to win statehood for the territory, see Monte B. McLaws, IIEarly Mormon Journalism and the Deseret News, 1830-1898,". (Ph.D. dissertation, University of Missouri, 1971). |