| OCR Text |
Show 107 -- 103-- call a deficiency curve, and then you have a number of days in the year when you have conditions varying on one side or another." R. 222- 223. " By the special master: " Q It would not mean anything unless you could show how much below it was. " Mr. Collins: May I make this suggestion? I am the only one that knows about this phase of the case. It was not until about the middle of September that I had determined that we had no scientific data sufficient to present to the special master in this case. We expected then to go to trial with the state of Utah in April, and therefore I had to get the witness out there as quickly as possible in order to get this scientific data. " The special Master: I just wanted to get a general picture of it. As he has described the various strikings on bars and so on, I wanted to get a picture in my mind as to how far it represented a more or less normal condition." R. 223- 224. " I believe when you study it, it will be very clearly shown by plate No. 29 of [ Complainant's] Exhibit 79, which is a compilation of something over 30,000 day observations at gauging stations on the Colorado, Green and San Juan Rivers. " Now, the particular question that was asked me was, How much the flow was below 4,900 second- feet in the Colorado? In the line shown by a dash and three dots, on plate 28, [ Complainant's Exhibit No. 79] is shown the daily deficiency curve, based on all of the stream flow records |
