OCR Text |
Show CALIFORNIA DEFENDANTS Exhibit No. 364 Identification: PALO VERDE II DISTRICT IRIGATION SALT CONTENT Diversion less canal return (Calif. Exh. 355, Col. 4-Col. 6) Estimated canal spillage into drains, 5% of Col. 4, Calif. Exh. 355 Water applied to land1 Salt Content of intake water Surface drain return (Calif. Exh. 355, Col. 7) Salt drain Content of return water Gain or loss in salts removed by surface drainage (See Calif. Exh. 244) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Year Acre Feet Acre Feet Acre Feet T/AF Tons Acre Feet T/AF Tons Tons 1951 583,800 35,290 548,510 0.92' 504,630 256,800 2.38* 611,180 106,550 Gain 1952 618,460 36,440 582,020 0.92' 535,460 281,530 2.092 588,400 52,940 Gain 1953 650,340 38,280 612,060 0.922 563,100 308,230 2.202 678,100 115,000 Gain 1954 724,630 43,050 681,580 1.04' 708,840 315,440 2.11' 665,580 43,260 Loss 1955 678,120 40,860 637,260 1.172 745,600 338,300 2.032 686,750 58,850 Loss 1956 765,990 47,470 718,520 1.20' 862,220 372,040 2.12s 788,720 73,500 Loss 5/1/56 4/30/57 742,420 46,670 695,750 1.202 834,900 354,890 2.212 784,310 50,590 Loss including canal evaporation and seepage 2By laboratory test 3Estimated or interpolated C. C. Tabor 6/14/57 |
Source |
Original book: [State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants, United States of America, State of Nevada, State of New Mexico, State of Utah, interveners] : California exhibits. |