| Title |
Issues Paper, Central Utah Project |
| Description |
Major publication compiled by Dorothy Harvey for the Citizens for a Responsible Central Utah Project; From The Dorothy Harvey papers (1902-2005), a collection of materials focusing on the Central Utah Project (CUP), a water resource development program to use Utah's alloted share of the Colorado River. Includes correspondence, Harvey's writing drafts and notes for an unpublished book on the CUP, federal documents, project litigation materials, subject files, news clippings, newsletters, programs, brochures, and maps. |
| Subject |
Central Utah Project; Rivers--Environmental aspects--Utah; Water resources development --Environmental aspects--Utah; Irrigation--Environmental aspects--Utah; Water-supply--Utah--Salt Lake County |
| Creator |
Harvey, Dorothy |
| Contributor |
Citizens for a Responsible Central Utah Project; Power, Thomas M.; Hughes, Trevor C.; Van Dam, R. Paul |
| Alternate Title |
Economic analysis of the Bonneville Unit of the Central Utah Project, Bureau of Reclamation; Feasibility of accelerating construction of the Central Utah Project; Water resources of Salt Lake County: an alternative view |
| Additional Information |
Includes as parts of this work: An economic analysis of the Bonneville Unit of the Central Utah Project, Bureau of Reclamation, by Thomas M. Power (68 p., June 1978); Feasibility of accelerating construction of the Central Utah Project, by Trevor C. Hughes, L. Douglas James, Frank Haws, C. Earl Israelsen (27 p., Jan. 16, 1978); Water resources of Salt Lake County: an alternative view, by R. Paul Van Dam (19 p., April 3, 1978); Interim report on CUP Bonneville Unit by R. Paul Van Dam (7 p., July 5, 1977); Statement of Gerald Kinghorn, Salt Lake Asst. Co. Attorney (7 p., 1977); Letter of R. Paul Van Dam to Arthur L. Monson (15 p., Nov. 18, 1977) |
| Spatial Coverage |
Colorado River Basin (Colo.-Mexico); Duchesne River (Utah); Uinta Mountains (Utah); Uinta Basin (Utah and Colo.); Rock Creek (Duchesne County, Utah); Lower Stillwater Reservoir (Utah); Upper Stillwater Reservoir (Utah); Bottle Hollow Reservoir (Utah); Starvation Reservoir (Utah); Currant Creek Reservoir (Utah); Jordanelle Reservoir (Utah); Strawberry Reservoir (Utah); Utah Lake (Utah); Utah County (Utah); Salt Lake County (Utah); Duchesne County (Utah) |
| Collection Number and Name |
Accn2232 bx 58 fd 5; Dorothy Harvey papers |
| Rights Management |
Digital Image Copyright 2009, University of Utah. All Rights Reserved. |
| Holding Institution |
J. Willard Marriott Library, University of Utah |
| Date |
1978 |
| Digitization Specifications |
Original scanned on Epson Expression 10000 XL and saved as 400 ppi TIFF. Display image generated by CONTENTdm. |
| Publisher |
Digitized by J. Willard Marriott Library, University of Utah |
| Type |
Text |
| ARK |
ark:/87278/s6cc0zmc |
| Setname |
wwdl_neh |
| ID |
1149704 |
| Reference URL |
https://collections.lib.utah.edu/ark:/87278/s6cc0zmc |
| Title |
Page 204 |
| Setname |
wwdl_neh |
| ID |
1149692 |
| OCR Text |
Show (J 8 Mr. Arthur L. Monson Page 12 November 18, 1977 exercised by the elected legislative body, whether state or local, which is subject to the control of the people. '* * * How sound and unchallengeable this latter ground is, must be evident to all those who recall that 'Taxation without representation' was the battle cry that precipitated the Revolution.'" The dissent also cites several other cases holding that delegation of the taxing power to an appointed board is unconstitutional, including the case of Wilson v. School District of Pennsylvania, 195 A. 90 (Pa. 1937) where the Utah court quoted from the Wilson case as follows: "* * * This section prohibits the delegation to any special commission of the Legislature's power to tax. The purpose of the provision was to protect against the exercise of the taxing power by officials not subject to the control of the people. This prohibition is not limited solely to municipal taxation. The words 'to levy taxes' are not modified by the word 'municipal,' whereas the remaining clauses in this section are specifically so modified. This demonstrates the intention of the framers that no taxing power whatever, state or municipal, be delegated to any special appointive commission. This section becomes an express and emphatic limitation on the power of the Legislature to delegate to a nonelective board or commission the power to tax. * * * As stated by Mr. Justice Linn in Tranter v. Allegheny County Authority, 316 Pa. 65, 173 A. 289, the main purpose of article 3, §20, was to correct the recognized economic mistake of taking the fiscal power away from the regular, |
| Reference URL |
https://collections.lib.utah.edu/ark:/87278/s6cc0zmc/1149692 |
