| Title |
Issues Paper, Central Utah Project |
| Description |
Major publication compiled by Dorothy Harvey for the Citizens for a Responsible Central Utah Project; From The Dorothy Harvey papers (1902-2005), a collection of materials focusing on the Central Utah Project (CUP), a water resource development program to use Utah's alloted share of the Colorado River. Includes correspondence, Harvey's writing drafts and notes for an unpublished book on the CUP, federal documents, project litigation materials, subject files, news clippings, newsletters, programs, brochures, and maps. |
| Subject |
Central Utah Project; Rivers--Environmental aspects--Utah; Water resources development --Environmental aspects--Utah; Irrigation--Environmental aspects--Utah; Water-supply--Utah--Salt Lake County |
| Creator |
Harvey, Dorothy |
| Contributor |
Citizens for a Responsible Central Utah Project; Power, Thomas M.; Hughes, Trevor C.; Van Dam, R. Paul |
| Alternate Title |
Economic analysis of the Bonneville Unit of the Central Utah Project, Bureau of Reclamation; Feasibility of accelerating construction of the Central Utah Project; Water resources of Salt Lake County: an alternative view |
| Additional Information |
Includes as parts of this work: An economic analysis of the Bonneville Unit of the Central Utah Project, Bureau of Reclamation, by Thomas M. Power (68 p., June 1978); Feasibility of accelerating construction of the Central Utah Project, by Trevor C. Hughes, L. Douglas James, Frank Haws, C. Earl Israelsen (27 p., Jan. 16, 1978); Water resources of Salt Lake County: an alternative view, by R. Paul Van Dam (19 p., April 3, 1978); Interim report on CUP Bonneville Unit by R. Paul Van Dam (7 p., July 5, 1977); Statement of Gerald Kinghorn, Salt Lake Asst. Co. Attorney (7 p., 1977); Letter of R. Paul Van Dam to Arthur L. Monson (15 p., Nov. 18, 1977) |
| Spatial Coverage |
Colorado River Basin (Colo.-Mexico); Duchesne River (Utah); Uinta Mountains (Utah); Uinta Basin (Utah and Colo.); Rock Creek (Duchesne County, Utah); Lower Stillwater Reservoir (Utah); Upper Stillwater Reservoir (Utah); Bottle Hollow Reservoir (Utah); Starvation Reservoir (Utah); Currant Creek Reservoir (Utah); Jordanelle Reservoir (Utah); Strawberry Reservoir (Utah); Utah Lake (Utah); Utah County (Utah); Salt Lake County (Utah); Duchesne County (Utah) |
| Collection Number and Name |
Accn2232 bx 58 fd 5; Dorothy Harvey papers |
| Rights Management |
Digital Image Copyright 2009, University of Utah. All Rights Reserved. |
| Holding Institution |
J. Willard Marriott Library, University of Utah |
| Date |
1978 |
| Digitization Specifications |
Original scanned on Epson Expression 10000 XL and saved as 400 ppi TIFF. Display image generated by CONTENTdm. |
| Publisher |
Digitized by J. Willard Marriott Library, University of Utah |
| Type |
Text |
| ARK |
ark:/87278/s6cc0zmc |
| Setname |
wwdl_neh |
| ID |
1149704 |
| Reference URL |
https://collections.lib.utah.edu/ark:/87278/s6cc0zmc |
| Title |
Page 165 |
| Setname |
wwdl_neh |
| ID |
1149653 |
| OCR Text |
Show Board of County Commissioners of Salt Lake County April 3, 1978 Page five >SS experts, analyzing their expert data, and disseminating the information developed by these experts. I am watching the mono-directional planners issue self-serving statements and tax paid press releases proposed by professional advertising firms and then I am attempting to present the undiscussed alternatives to their philosophy. D. The fourth major issue raised imputes that I am single-handedly trying to destroy the free enterprise system by encouraging the County to become more involved in water management issues. To this, I can only reply that the existing system is even farther removed from the free market system than County management. The approach being pushed by existing water managers to free enterprise includes appropriation of water by the federal government to be managed and allocated outside of the state appropriation system. This approach also involves the levying and use of tax dollars by non-elected officials to pay for water projects without regard for whom the water being developed is to be used and without public accounting as to the manner in which these dollars are spent. For instance, the residents of Salt Lake City own water rights to the best quality waters in the Valley, more operating wells than any other entity, and hold over 60,000 acre feet of reserves in Deer Creek Reservoir--enough extra water to supply the needs of 225,000 people for one year. However, they are currently paying some $905,000.00 annually to the Central Utah Water Conservancy District to build a project which will provide $120/acre foot water. At the same time, these Salt Lake City citizens sell their excess reserves at $20/acre foot. The citizens of Salt Lake County also are paying tax dollars for this project whether or not they are to receive any of the water to be developed by it. In fact, water developed by Salt Lake County tax dollars will end up generating power in Millard County for use in Southern California. If free enterprise means management and allocation by the federal government and taxation without representation, then I admit that T oppose this system. II. WHAT WE HOPE TO ACCOMPLISH WITH THIS STUDY Salt Lake County and Salt Lake City are in a position to be envied with respect to water resources. The current resource picture includes a massive underground aquifer, tremendous mountain run-off, imports from the Colorado basin, and diversions from Utah Lake. The supply is adequate, with competent and aggressive management, to sustain the growth of Salt Lake City and Salt Lake |
| Reference URL |
https://collections.lib.utah.edu/ark:/87278/s6cc0zmc/1149653 |