| Title |
Issues Paper, Central Utah Project |
| Description |
Major publication compiled by Dorothy Harvey for the Citizens for a Responsible Central Utah Project; From The Dorothy Harvey papers (1902-2005), a collection of materials focusing on the Central Utah Project (CUP), a water resource development program to use Utah's alloted share of the Colorado River. Includes correspondence, Harvey's writing drafts and notes for an unpublished book on the CUP, federal documents, project litigation materials, subject files, news clippings, newsletters, programs, brochures, and maps. |
| Subject |
Central Utah Project; Rivers--Environmental aspects--Utah; Water resources development --Environmental aspects--Utah; Irrigation--Environmental aspects--Utah; Water-supply--Utah--Salt Lake County |
| Creator |
Harvey, Dorothy |
| Contributor |
Citizens for a Responsible Central Utah Project; Power, Thomas M.; Hughes, Trevor C.; Van Dam, R. Paul |
| Alternate Title |
Economic analysis of the Bonneville Unit of the Central Utah Project, Bureau of Reclamation; Feasibility of accelerating construction of the Central Utah Project; Water resources of Salt Lake County: an alternative view |
| Additional Information |
Includes as parts of this work: An economic analysis of the Bonneville Unit of the Central Utah Project, Bureau of Reclamation, by Thomas M. Power (68 p., June 1978); Feasibility of accelerating construction of the Central Utah Project, by Trevor C. Hughes, L. Douglas James, Frank Haws, C. Earl Israelsen (27 p., Jan. 16, 1978); Water resources of Salt Lake County: an alternative view, by R. Paul Van Dam (19 p., April 3, 1978); Interim report on CUP Bonneville Unit by R. Paul Van Dam (7 p., July 5, 1977); Statement of Gerald Kinghorn, Salt Lake Asst. Co. Attorney (7 p., 1977); Letter of R. Paul Van Dam to Arthur L. Monson (15 p., Nov. 18, 1977) |
| Spatial Coverage |
Colorado River Basin (Colo.-Mexico); Duchesne River (Utah); Uinta Mountains (Utah); Uinta Basin (Utah and Colo.); Rock Creek (Duchesne County, Utah); Lower Stillwater Reservoir (Utah); Upper Stillwater Reservoir (Utah); Bottle Hollow Reservoir (Utah); Starvation Reservoir (Utah); Currant Creek Reservoir (Utah); Jordanelle Reservoir (Utah); Strawberry Reservoir (Utah); Utah Lake (Utah); Utah County (Utah); Salt Lake County (Utah); Duchesne County (Utah) |
| Collection Number and Name |
Accn2232 bx 58 fd 5; Dorothy Harvey papers |
| Rights Management |
Digital Image Copyright 2009, University of Utah. All Rights Reserved. |
| Holding Institution |
J. Willard Marriott Library, University of Utah |
| Date |
1978 |
| Digitization Specifications |
Original scanned on Epson Expression 10000 XL and saved as 400 ppi TIFF. Display image generated by CONTENTdm. |
| Publisher |
Digitized by J. Willard Marriott Library, University of Utah |
| Type |
Text |
| ARK |
ark:/87278/s6cc0zmc |
| Setname |
wwdl_neh |
| ID |
1149704 |
| Reference URL |
https://collections.lib.utah.edu/ark:/87278/s6cc0zmc |
| Title |
Page 43 |
| Setname |
wwdl_neh |
| ID |
1149531 |
| OCR Text |
Show 3£ 3. N. Opportunity Costs Please detail these. Attached to this letter are items we have listed as being appropriate, and sources for recommendations, i.e., water studies, economic analysis, and in consultation with legal and amenity resource experts such as John Krutilla "The Economics of Natural Resources", Resources for the Future pub-" lication. We have included commentary related to the subject and the issues in Utah in this Appendix A. 0. Recreational Development Costs We feel that for several reasons, these costs are part of the cost to the taxpayer for each acre foot of water developed. Firjrt: Although they are not mitigation in kind, these recreational sites on the new reservoirs have been touted as a partial mitigation measure. Second.: Tney are used to build public support for Reclamation Projects. Third: Their development has not been entered into in open, objective and cooperative discussions with the agencies managing public lands and wildlife. The Forest Service has long opposed reservoir development in both Rock Creek and Whiterocks Canyons in the interests of protecting outstanding stream and canyon recreation values adjacent to high country wilderness areas. The Utah Division of Wildlife Resources and the Forest Service, through the Fish and Wildlife Service, have emphatically and persistently advocated the protection of Uinta Range and other northeast Utah wild streams, their fisheries and riparian values, since the early 19 50Ts - in vain! Studies have indicated that Utah has a surplus already of flatwater recreation facilities . Thus a massive#investment in additional flatwater recreational facilities would not be the choice of most recreational planners in investing funds in recreational development in Utah. (Additional commentary on the value of trout streams in Utah - free flowing streams - is provided under Mitigation Costs and Opportunity Costs) ^Studies on population trends for the Colorado River Basin - state that there is no projected need for more reservoir fishing until the year 2,0 2 0! |
| Reference URL |
https://collections.lib.utah.edu/ark:/87278/s6cc0zmc/1149531 |