OCR Text |
Show Table H- 7 Summary of Alternative Sources of Water Unit of Proposed Alternatives Within the Bonneville Unit Area Alternatives Within the Bonneville Basin Increased Use of Local Stream Weather Desalting Geothermal Low Elev. ImportaHigh Elev. ImportaImportation It em Measurement Plan Groundwater Development Modification tion from Weber. R. tion from Weber R. from Bear River I. Project area lands A. Full service Acres 29,370 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 B. Supplemental service Acres 213,170 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 89,000 C. Wildlife marsh area Acres 16,640 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 II. Water supply A. Effect on Colorado River 1. Depletion to Colorado River Ac- ft/ yr 166,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2. Deterioration of water quality B. Utah Lake Mg/ liter 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1. Evaporation Ac- ft/ yr 201,400 329,600 329,600 329,600 329,600 329,600 329,600 329,600 329,600 2. Spills ( avg. annual) Co Great Salt Lake Ac- ft/ yr 62,300 ND!/ 48,100 48,100 48,100 48,100 48,100 48,100 48,100 48,100 1. Inflow Ac- ft/ yr ND ND ND ND ND ! ND ND ND 2. Area Acres ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND D. Diversion to Sevier River E. Fishery minimum flow Ac- ft/ yr 36,000 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1. Uintah Basin Ac- ft/ yr 6,500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2. Bonneville Basin Ac- ft/ yr 14,000 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND III. Structural measures A. Proposed new reservoir or enlargements 1. Number Number 11 1 2 0 0 1 1 5 2. Accumulated total capacity Ac- ft 2,455,000 48,000 48,000 0 0 150,000 150,000 641,500 3. Accumulated surface area B. Canals and distribution systems Acres 91,880 1,810 555 0 0 1,210 1,530 10,370 1. Area served Acres 29,370 0 0 ND 0 ND 0 0 ND 2. Total length Miles 255 ND ND ND ND ND 32 21 58 IV. Service rendered A. Irrigation supply 1. Uinta Basin a. Full service Ac- ft/ yr 0 0 0 ND 0 0 0 0 0 b. Supplemental service 2. Bonneville Basin Ac- ft/ yr 21,400 0 0 ND ND 0 0 0 0 53,000 a. Full service Ac- ft/ yr 85,200 0 0 ND 0 0 0 0 0 b. Supplemental service B. Municipal and industrial water 1. High quality Ac- ft/ yr 88,400 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a. Uinta Basin Ac- ft/ yr 0 0 0 ND 0 0 0 0 0 b. Bonneville Basin 2. Low quality Ac- ft/ yr 99,000 18,000 18,200 ND 100,000 ND 45,000 45,000 100,000 a. Uinta Basin Ac- ft/ yr 0 0 0 ND 0 0 0 0 0 b. Bonneville Basin C. Recreation Ac- ft/ yr 172,000 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND Project reservoirs D. Fishing, hunting, and wildlife Man- days 700,000 0 ND ND 0 0 ND ND ND 1. Fishing Man- days 934,200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2. Hunting and wildlife E. Environment Man- days 140,100 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1. Beneficial effects a. Water surface areas Acres 91,860 1,810 555 0 0 0 1,210 1,530 10,370 b. Shoreline c. Improve habitat Miles 285 237 ND 0 0 0 ND ND ND ( 1) Drains Miles 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ( 2) Distribution system 2. Adverse effects a. Reservoir inundation Miles 149 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ( 1) Open and green space Acres 20,258 1,810 555 0 0 0 1,210 1,530 10,370 ( 2) Streams Miles 42 ND 3 ND 0 0 2 5 47 b. Loss of native habitat by irrigation c. Deterioration of water quality in lower Colorado River Basin Acres 29,370 0 0 ND 0 0 0 0 ND ( 1) Increased TDS ( total dissolved solids) Mg/ liter 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ( 2) Decreased streamflow Ac- ft/ yr 166,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 d. Exposed distribution systems Miles 149 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND e. Exposed drains Miles 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V. Estimated costs a. Construction cost of alternative $ 1,000 512,618 17,000 50,150 ND ND ND 96,000 117,000 187,000 b. Cost of municipal and industrial water c. Bonneville Unit costs to be borne by $/ ac- ft 65 62 94 ND 150- 200 100- 200 138 160 132 general public $ 1,000 0 91,705 91,705 91,705 91,705 91,705 91,705 91,705 91,705 1/ ND denotes " no data available." 548 |