AZ vs. CA:14 California Exhibits, Vol. XIV; Nos. 2051-2100

page 10

10 1 k* m the instrument evidencing any meh patent, grant, 2 contract, eonccopion, leanc, permit; lioonoo, right el way, r*T IH Ili'I I'llTlll JJJ1 rTTTfTt TTTT* v 111(111 I 'tlWXJa TTT 1I1IIIU1 TVO 4 authority, w nek a«4 t4wtt be dconiod te fee lep the benefit 5 el a**} be available to the States el Ariaono, Californin, 6 Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming, *w4 7 the Hsefs el water thereunder, by way el defense e* other 8 wise? m my litigation reopeeting the waters el the Colorado 9 River. J^ll CTBl" - • ¥TT 1 X1UV an TclTTTfo T7T v»»v* v-/ *«aw/\» nTTTTTTn IUIU *W »* t 11 the 8ceretnrj' el the Interior te be iiraetioablc el irrigation 12 and rcclnmntion hf the irrigation works outhori«o<l herein 13 fihatt be withdrawn Irem public entry. Thorctiftor, at the 14 direction el the Secretary el the Interior, «*eh hwwfe XU r^^> VIFVIW-A* TT?T llfvl J J TTT TTTKTTo Till ^f n i^ TTT WWJC Ufltj fHfX V^ 16 htg e»e hundred a«4 aixty aerc», He f»«y be determined by 17 the Secretary el the Interior, m accordance with the fM>e- 18 vioions el the rcelflmation tew^ a*4 any etieh cntryman shatt 19 l**y «*» equitable slutre in accordance with the benefits 20 received, as determined by the said Secretary; el the eea- 21 atruction eeet ef said eanai a«4 appurtenant otnteturoB; said 22 payments te be made in sueh inotalhncntfl aa4 at stteh 23 tees as may be opecified by the Secretary el the Interior,- 24 *» accordance with the provisiono el the said rcclamatieft 7 a»d shatt oonotitutc revenue !*em said prejeet and he