OCR Text |
Show Exhibit Iden. Evid. No. Page No. Page No. 2094 S. 728, 70th Cong., 1st Sess., Senate, May 3, 1928, Amendment Proposed by Mr. Neely. [Pre-Trial Item 233.] 2095 S. 728, 70th Cong., 1st Sess., Senate, May 3, 1928, Amendments Proposed by Mr. Hayden (on page 3 and 4, strike out). [Pre-Trial Item 233.] 2096 S. 728, 70th Cong., 1st Sess., Senate, May 3, 1928, Amendment Proposed by Mr. Hayden (on page 2, line 17). [Pre-Trial Item 233.] 2097 S. 728, 70th Cong., 1st Sess., Senate, May 3, 1928, Amendments Proposed by Mr. Hayden (on page 3, line 5). [Pre-Trial Item 233.] 2098 S. 728, 70th Cong., 1st Sess., Senate, May 3, 1928, Amendment Proposed by Mr. Hayden (on page 22, line 3). [Pre-Trial Item 233.] 2099 S. 728, 70th Cong., 1st Sess., Senate, May 3, 1928, Amendment Proposed by Mr. Hayden (on page 5, line 19). [Pre-Trial Item 233.] 2100 S. 728, 70th Cong., 1st Sess., Senate, May 3, 1928, Amendments Proposed by Mr. Hayden (on page 7, line 1). [Pre-Trial Item 233.] |
Source |
Original book: [State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants, United States of America, State of Nevada, State of New Mexico, State of Utah, interveners] : California exhibits. |