| OCR Text |
Show are shown in Table 2-17 and graphically in Figure 2-16. Results are basically consistent with those by impact category, with nearly 80 percent of all participants voting for the sc called "Wise Growth" scenario. Generally, the things participants said they liked about the Wise Growth vs. Business Usual include: • Increased access to community parks; • Protected natural areas and open space; • Decreased agricultural land consumption; • Increased access to transit; • Increased access to existing public services; • Decreased cost and expansion of future infrastructure; • Jobs and services located adjacent to developed areas reducing travel times; • Decreased expenditures for police, fire and other services Table 2-15: Summary of Impacts Adapted Trend Forecast Wise Growth Build Out Wise Growth Build Out Community Services • O O • Environmental 33,742 21,339 70,977 21,339 Environmental Justice 44% 90% 21% 26% Utilities 43.5% 68% 15.5% 68% Cost of Public Service $ 23,695,000 $ 31,597,000 $ 173,997,000 $ 271,388,000 Transportation $ 45,800,000 $ 91,800,000 $ 1,690,700,000 $ 136,500,000 Land Use 201,098 191,002 239,770 191,002 Quality of Life o • o • I Good | Fair I Poor I f \ 2-66 |