| OCR Text |
Show rorrected final figures, as used throughout the rest of this Regional 2025 Transportation Plan are accurately portrayed elsewhere in this plan (see Chapter 6 and 9, for examples). However, since the earlier figure used in Table 2-13 was the same in each build out alternative, the relative differences between the impacts of the two build out scenarios would remain the same, and would not impact alternatives selection. Since the horizon vearof the Regional 2025 Transportation Plan is 2025, and these build out scenarios are neither adopted or used the basis for alternate selection or preparation of this plan, no attempt has been made to adjust the relative impacts in the two build out scenarios to reflect the revised population data or per capita results of these two scenarios as shown correctly throughout the rest of this report. However, it should be noted that the absolute impacts of build out or wise growth build out are overstated by these preliminary results as shown in Table 2-13, since the preliminary total regional population figure used to develop the build out totals was estimated to be between 200,000 and 300,000 greater than the finalized figures. Employment and employment related totals data shown in Table 2-13 for all scenarios are accurate. All data for the Trends and Wise Growth scenarios are also accurate and not impacted by the corrected population figures applied in the finalized Build Out and Wise Growth Build Out scenarios. Only population and per capita impacts of these two build out scenarios would be different had the finalized figures been available at the time this work was done, and again, the relative impacts between the two build out scenarios would not change. Corrected finalized figures were used in the comparative air quality analysis and results discussed in the next section. 2-59 |
