| OCR Text |
Show TABLE 10.-Other projects to complete the ultimate plans as now envisioned, Ohio River Basin (exclusive of Tennessee River)-Continued No.* Project and State River Ultimate installed capacity Average annual energy Active storage Youghiogheny, Pennsylvania. . . , Sang Run, Maryland.......... Swallow Falls, Maryland....... No. 18, West Virginia.......... Big Sandy, West Virginia....... No. 15, West Virginia.......... No. 14, West Virginia.......... No. 13, West Virginia.......... No. 12, West Virginia.......... Blackwater No. 2, West Virginia. Blackwater No. 1, West Virginia. Wamsley, West Virginia........ Glady Fork, West Virginia...... Tygart, West Virginia........... Laurel, West Virginia.......... Kittanning, Pennsylvania......, Foxburg, Pennsylvania....... Piney, Pennsylvania *......... Mill Greek, Pennsylvania......, Kinzua, Pennsylvania.......... Rough River, Kentucky........ Mining City, Kentucky......... Barren No. 2, Kentucky........ Nolin River, Kentucky......... East Fork, Ohio............... Oregonia, Ohio............... Gaeser Creek, Ohio *.......... Towers, Kentucky............. Rolling Fork, Kentucky........ No. 1, Pennsylvania............ No. 2, Pennsylvania............ No. 3, Pennsylvania............ No. 4, Pennsylvania............ Youghiogheny. ____do...... .....do...... .Cheat....... Sandy Creek. Cheat....... ....do...... ....do........ ....do........ Horse Shoe Run. Blackwater..... Shavers Fork. . . ____do........ Tygart... .....do... Allegheny. Clarion.. . .....do... .....do............... Allegheny............. Rough................ Green................ Barren................ Nolin................. East Fork, Little Miami. Little Miami.......... Caeser Creek.......... Russell Fork.......... Salt.................. Connoquenessing Creek. Slippery Rock Greek... ____do.............. ....do.............. Total "other projects to complete ultimate plans." Kilowatts 24, 000 69, 000 24, 000 50, 000 54, 000 65,000 65, 000 90,000 110,000 65, 000 57, 000 40,000 72, 000 40, 000 70, 000 200, 000 70, 000 9,600 100, 000 40, 000 4,000 30, 000 50, 000 22, 000 10, 000 5,000 50,000 50,000 4,900 45, 000 13, 000 25, 000 17, 000 Million kilowatt- hours 76.3 162.0 57.4 105.0 120.0 140.0 140.0 235.0 240.0 108.0 72.0 81.0 150.0 173.0 197.0 975.0 182.0 175.0 124.0 14.3 150.0 105.0 59.0 32.0 15.0 80.0 140.0 30.3 59.0 20.0 35.0 26.0 1,000 acre- feet 100.0 200.0 490.0 8.8 112.0 90.0 270.0 600.0 630.0 520.0 122.0 683.0 653.0 300.0 164.0 25.0 117.5 170.0 90.0 25.0 30.0 5,117,900 22, 312. 9 10, 509. 8 1 Numbers correspond to numbers on figure 4. 2 Redevelopment. 8 Additional installed capacity. 4 Pumped storage project. Source: Federal Power Commission. the hydroelectric power potentialities of the basin. These other projects include a number studied and reported by the Corps of Engineers and some additional ones considered by the Federal Power Commission or studied by its staff, as well as some with respect to which studies and determinations of feasibility vary from complete to preliminary investigations. On tributaries, power generation is related usu- ally but not always to construction of multiple- 911610-51- 651 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 17 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 |
