| Title |
Central Utah Project Litigation Documents |
| Description |
Correspondence and documents concerning litigation for the Bonneville Unit of the Central Utah Project; from the The Dorothy Harvey papers (1902-2005), a collection of materials focusing on the Central Utah Project (CUP), a water resource development program to use Utah's alloted share of the Colorado River. Includes correspondence, federal documents, project litigation materials. |
| Subject |
Central Utah Project. Bonneville Unit; Colorado River Storage Project (U.S.); Ute Indians--Claims; Water resources development--Environmental aspects--Utah; Natural resources--Environmental aspects--Utah; Natural resources--Management--Utah; Strawberry Aqueduct; Western Bands of Shoshoni Indians--Claims |
| Contributor |
Ruckel, H. Anthony; Oberhansly, Curtis K.; Owens, Wayne; Raskin, David C.; Leshy, John D.; Olsen, Dennis F.; Phillips, Howard K.; Barker, Robert W.; Hatch, Orrin G.; Blackwelder, Brent; Carlson, Peter; Lynn, Laurence E.; Horton, Jack O.; Reed, Nathaniel P.; Black, Kenneth E. |
| Additional Information |
Includes: Letters and documents concerning Sierra Club, et al. v. Gilbert Stamm, et al.; Water Resources Development Act of 1974; Letters from the Sierra Club Legal Defense Fund, Natural Resources Defense Council, the Environmental Policy Center; United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit case No. 74-1425 Sierra Club, etc., et al. v. Gilbert Stamm, etc., et al.; Case before the Indian Claims Commission: Western Shoshone Identifiable Group etc., et al. v. United States of America; Memo from Department of the Interior on the Central Utah Project, Bonneville Unit; Study from Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife: Stream Flows Recommended For the Uinta Mountain Streams, Central Utah Project; U.S. Dept. of Interior Water Projects Review Office Preliminary Information and Data Sheets for Bonneville Unit |
| Spatial Coverage |
Uinta Basin (Utah and Colo.); Little Dell Reservoir (Utah); Currant Creek Dam (Utah); Uintah and Ouray Indian Reservation (Utah); Utah Lake (Utah); Provo River (Utah); Bonneville Basin (Utah); Salt Lake County (Utah); Jordanelle Reservoir (Utah); Uinta Mountains (Utah and Wyo.); Colorado River Watershed (Colo.-Mexico) |
| Collection Number and Name |
Accn2232 Bx 118 Fd 2; Dorothy Harvey papers |
| Rights Management |
Digital Image © 2010 University of Utah. All Rights Reserved. |
| Holding Institution |
J. Willard Marriott Library, University of Utah |
| Date |
1973; 1974; 1975; 1977; 1978; 1979; 1980 |
| Digitization Specifications |
Original scanned on Epson Expression 10000 XL and saved as 400 ppi TIFF. Display image generated in Contentdm. |
| Publisher |
Digitized by J. Willard Marriott Library, University of Utah |
| Type |
Text |
| ARK |
ark:/87278/s6hh6j1p |
| Setname |
wwdl_neh |
| ID |
1155349 |
| Reference URL |
https://collections.lib.utah.edu/ark:/87278/s6hh6j1p |
| Title |
Page 78 |
| Setname |
wwdl_neh |
| ID |
1155271 |
| OCR Text |
Show 35 I fid. Cl. Comm. »>5/ *»(.»/ 6. That the Western Shoshone identifiable group exclusively used and occupied the lands described in Find in;; of Fact No. 23; that the Indian title to such of the lands of the western Shoshone group as arc located in the present State of California was extinguished en March 3, 1S53; and that as to the remainder of the lands of the Western Shoshone, Indian title was extinguished by the gradual enciva •••: : '--j^^y whites, settlers :\;-\d others, and the acquisition-, di.^^ft-ti. on or taking of said lands by the United States lor its own use and benefit, or the use end benefit of its . citizens. [ll Ind. Cl. Comm. 387, 446 (1962). ] This brief summary of the process of adjudication of the quantity of land involved and of the extinguishment of aboriginal title demonstrates that, contrary to the petitioners' assertions of collusion, these issues were tried and determined by the Commission after hearing and considering the evidence of both parties thereon. However, the determination of the date for valuation of plaintiff's Nevada land was concluded in a different way. The Commission's determination that the extinguishment of the plaintiff's aboriginal title to these lands was gradual (not a sudden extinguishment) was the basis of its holding in Finding 26 that it might not then set the date of acquisition of these lands by the United States. The Commission found that the United States, without payment of compensation, acquired, controlled, or treated these lands of the Western Shoshones r as public lands from a date or dates long prior to the title proceeding, such date or dates to be thereafter determined upon further proof, unless the plaintiff and defendant agreed upon a date. The requirement that further-proof be taken unless the parties agreed upon the date or dates when the defendant acquired, controlled, or treated the plaintiff's land.-*- as .-.-L Li-lends war: contained in Finding 26 of the Co:::^ir:sion title decision isruo.-V on October 16, 1962. |
| Reference URL |
https://collections.lib.utah.edu/ark:/87278/s6hh6j1p/1155271 |