| Title |
Central Utah Project Litigation Documents |
| Description |
Correspondence and documents concerning litigation for the Bonneville Unit of the Central Utah Project; from the The Dorothy Harvey papers (1902-2005), a collection of materials focusing on the Central Utah Project (CUP), a water resource development program to use Utah's alloted share of the Colorado River. Includes correspondence, federal documents, project litigation materials. |
| Subject |
Central Utah Project. Bonneville Unit; Colorado River Storage Project (U.S.); Ute Indians--Claims; Water resources development--Environmental aspects--Utah; Natural resources--Environmental aspects--Utah; Natural resources--Management--Utah; Strawberry Aqueduct; Western Bands of Shoshoni Indians--Claims |
| Contributor |
Ruckel, H. Anthony; Oberhansly, Curtis K.; Owens, Wayne; Raskin, David C.; Leshy, John D.; Olsen, Dennis F.; Phillips, Howard K.; Barker, Robert W.; Hatch, Orrin G.; Blackwelder, Brent; Carlson, Peter; Lynn, Laurence E.; Horton, Jack O.; Reed, Nathaniel P.; Black, Kenneth E. |
| Additional Information |
Includes: Letters and documents concerning Sierra Club, et al. v. Gilbert Stamm, et al.; Water Resources Development Act of 1974; Letters from the Sierra Club Legal Defense Fund, Natural Resources Defense Council, the Environmental Policy Center; United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit case No. 74-1425 Sierra Club, etc., et al. v. Gilbert Stamm, etc., et al.; Case before the Indian Claims Commission: Western Shoshone Identifiable Group etc., et al. v. United States of America; Memo from Department of the Interior on the Central Utah Project, Bonneville Unit; Study from Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife: Stream Flows Recommended For the Uinta Mountain Streams, Central Utah Project; U.S. Dept. of Interior Water Projects Review Office Preliminary Information and Data Sheets for Bonneville Unit |
| Spatial Coverage |
Uinta Basin (Utah and Colo.); Little Dell Reservoir (Utah); Currant Creek Dam (Utah); Uintah and Ouray Indian Reservation (Utah); Utah Lake (Utah); Provo River (Utah); Bonneville Basin (Utah); Salt Lake County (Utah); Jordanelle Reservoir (Utah); Uinta Mountains (Utah and Wyo.); Colorado River Watershed (Colo.-Mexico) |
| Collection Number and Name |
Accn2232 Bx 118 Fd 2; Dorothy Harvey papers |
| Rights Management |
Digital Image © 2010 University of Utah. All Rights Reserved. |
| Holding Institution |
J. Willard Marriott Library, University of Utah |
| Date |
1973; 1974; 1975; 1977; 1978; 1979; 1980 |
| Digitization Specifications |
Original scanned on Epson Expression 10000 XL and saved as 400 ppi TIFF. Display image generated in Contentdm. |
| Publisher |
Digitized by J. Willard Marriott Library, University of Utah |
| Type |
Text |
| ARK |
ark:/87278/s6hh6j1p |
| Setname |
wwdl_neh |
| ID |
1155349 |
| Reference URL |
https://collections.lib.utah.edu/ark:/87278/s6hh6j1p |
| Title |
Page 66 |
| Setname |
wwdl_neh |
| ID |
1155259 |
| OCR Text |
Show ERNEST L. WILKINSON JOHN W. CRAG UN soe-iasa GwEN A. WiLKiNSON ROBERT W. BARKER CHARLES A. HOBBS ANGELO A. IAOAROLA PAUL S QUINN LEON T. KNAUER RiCriARQA.BAENEN JERRY C- STRAUS HER2ERT E MARKS .-iCrtSE J. LAFOMCE FRANCES L.HORN GORDON C. COFFMAN WiLKiNSON, CRAGUN & BARKER LAW OFFICES T H E OCTAGON B U I L D I NG 1735 NEW YORK A V E N U E . N . W. W A S H I N G T O N , D. C. 2 0 0 0 6 (202) 833-9800 CABLE ADDRESS "WILCBAR" February 21 , 1975 To Members of the Western Shoshone Claims Committee ROSEL H. HYDE DONALD C GORMLEY R.ANTHONY ROGERS PATRICIA L. 3ROWN WILLIAM R. LOFTUS STEPHEN R BELL THOMAS J. EACA5 FOSTER DCREiTZES -^=A^CAN I. RUBINSTEIN JOHN M. FACCIOLA PHILIP A. NACKE H. MICHAEL SEMLER THOMAS E.WILSON JERRY R.GOLDSTEIN EDWARD M.FOGARTY S.STEVEN KARALEKAS Re: Docket No. 326-K As you know, the effort of the so-called Western Shoshone Legal Defense and Education Association and Frank Temoke to amend and alter the Western Shoshone case have delayed its conclusion. (Delay in this case is expensive, as each such delay in placing the judgment at interest costs $2,353,866, and each week costs $45,266 in lost interest at the rate of 9%.) The basis they asserted, to try to get standing in the case, was to allege "collusion" between the United States and your counsel with respect to the issue of taking of Indian title. You have no doubt read of such charges, which have been widely broadcast. The Indian Claims Commis opinion denying the request of the Association and Temoke. They have the charge of collusion; that they and that the effort to reconsider title had been extinguished comes Commission also rejects the reques until the Mary and Carrie Dann cas public domain, is decided. sion has now issued its Legal Defense and Education found there is no merit to charge is contrary to fact the earlier ruling that Indian eleven years too late. The t that your case be delayed e, involving trespass on the As to the charged collusion, the Commission found: ". . .the contentions of collusion upon which the petition and supporting statements are based are untenable. . . ." We forward herewith a copy of the order and opinion. We hope the Commission will now promptly conclude its work on "offsets claimed by the government so its judgment for $26,154,000, less determined offsets (deductions) may become final. |
| Reference URL |
https://collections.lib.utah.edu/ark:/87278/s6hh6j1p/1155259 |