OCR Text |
Show [45] and 25 ft. deep. Aggregate expenditure in compliance with the legal requirements, from $12,000. to $15,000. {See map of improvements attached.) Question 9. Over how many acres of this land have you seen water distributed through and by means of said ditches? Give the date of each distribution, the time occupied in making same, and the quantity of water per acre used. (State the quantity of water in acre-feet, miner's inches, or some recognized unit of measurement.) Answer. Water has been run over 140 acres. This has been done every year. There is water available to irrigate the entire entry, from said Imperial Irrigation ditch. Question 10. If there are any high points or uneven surfaces not susceptible of practicable irrigation, state definitely the nature and aggregate area of same, and the proportion thereof in each legal subdivision of the entry. Is less than one-eighth of any legal subdivision susceptible of irrigation? Answer. No. Question 11. Has any portion of the land been cultivated by actual tillage of the soil? If so, state definitely the number of acres thus tilled and describe generally the tillage, and briefly state its time, its object, and its result. What portion, if any, of the land so tilled was irrigated ? Answer. Yes. Have planted, cultivated and irrigated about 120 to 130 acres. Question 12. Has an agricultural crop been planted and irrigated on said land? If so, state the kind of crop, when planted, the average yield per acre, and the number of acres so cultivated. (If crops have been thus pro- |
Source |
Original book: [State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants, United States of America, State of Nevada, State of New Mexico, State of Utah, interveners] : |