OCR Text |
Show [11] question 9. State whether you have seen water distributed through and by means of said ditches over all the irrigable area in each legal subdivision for which this proof is made with a view to the proper reclamation thereof, and if so, state the dates when each distribution was made, and the quantity of water per acre used, and the time occupied in making the same, in each and every year. answer. Saw water in all the ditches in October, 1911. 38 acres irrigated in 1911. Has been water on 80 acres more. question 10. If there are any high points or uneven surfaces not susceptible of practicable irrigation, state definitely the nature, extent, and aggregate area of same, and the proportion thereof in each legal subdivision of the entry. State whether any entire legal subdivision is not susceptible of irrigation. answer. None. question 11. Has any portion of the land been cultivated by actual tillage of the soil? If so, state definitely the number of acres thus tilled, and describe generally the tillage, and briefly state its time, its object, and its result. answer. 38 acres cultivated and planted to crop, milo maize, in 1911, good crop. No crop in 1912. 18 acres planted to wheat and bugs ate it up in 1913. question 12. Has an agricultural crop of any kind other than wild hay been planted or produced on any portion of the land? If so, state the kind of crop planted or raised, the average quantity per acre, and the number of acres employed in the planting and growth of said crop. answer. See answer to Q. 11. |
Source |
Original book: [State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants, United States of America, State of Nevada, State of New Mexico, State of Utah, interveners] : |