OCR Text |
Show IN THE FIFTH JUDICIAL BTSTHICT COURT, COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, STATE OF UTAH R. E. Caldwell, State Engineer of Utah, Plaintiff, vs Bripham Carpenter, Ben Harris, Leany, Leeds Water Company, Ira McMullin, Oscar McMullin, M. L, McAllister, Geo. C. Naegle, Purgatory Irrigation Co#, John A. Parker, et al«, R. C. Savage, Thomas Stirling, Vta. D. Sullivan, lalter H. Slick, Edidn A. Vincent, Wm. E. Woodbury, D# V. Harris, P. E. Harris, et al., Defendants• FILED la Fifth Judicial District Cour Washington County, Utah March. 5th, 1923 /s/ William Brooks Clerk DECREE Temp. Exhibit No..... Utah Exhibit No............ Went.........................Adm. This case havinp been duly submitted to the court on stipulation signed by all parties, and it appearing from said stipulation and from the records of tfM* case that all parties have consented to the determination of water rights as ma (to by the State Engineer of the State of Utah under the provisions of Chapter 67, Session Laws of 1919, State of Utah, and have consented that the provisions of said determination be made the decree of this court# and it further appearing that it is the desire of all parties that this court retain jurisdiction of the waters of Quail Creek for a period of five years from the date hereof for the purpose of determining the proper duty of watery IT IS THEREFORE OREERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED BY THE COURT: I. That Quail Creek Is a natural stream of water which with all its tributaries lies within Washington County, State of Utah; that said stream rises in the Pine Valley Mountains and flows in a southeasterly direction to a junction with the Virgin River in said county; that said creek is a fluctuating stream and that all of the waters thereof are of such quality that they may be applied to beneficial uses for culinary, domestic and other purposes; and that all of the waters of said stream and its tributaries are within the jurisdiction of this court. That notwithstanding this decree and any rights herein adjudged and decreed to any of the parties to this action, no such party or water user from said stream shall at any time divert more water than can be beneficially used and the |
Source |
Original book: Utah exhibits [of the] State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants, United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners, State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties |