OCR Text |
Show Sec. 25, T. 39 »•, R. 17 W. (b) 0,09 c.f.s. of said water to be diverted from Mag-otsu Creek, a tributary of Santa Clara ^iver at a point approx. 2500 ft, N. and 550 ft. W. of SE cor. Sec. 25, T. 39 s., R. 17 W., into the Bowler Ranch i>Ltch and used to irrigate 5»6 acres of land in said Sec. 25. (f) ALBERT TRUKAN, Gunlock, Washington County, Utah. Priority date Prior to Quantity Point of diversion and place and purpose of use. 1890 OM c.f.s. gaid water t0 be diverted from the Magctsu Creek, a tributary of Santa Clara River at a point approx. L50 ft. W. and 250 ft. S. of NE cor. Sec. 19, T# 39 S., R. 16 W#, S.L.B.&M, into the Farm Ditch and used to irrigate 28#5 acres of land in said Sec. 19. The said rights of said Hyrum Jones, Henry Bowler, John Bowler, Mar Bracken, Henry Hunt, and Albert Turner are of equal priority and are designated as Class 1 Rights, and when there is not sufficient water to supply all of said parties they shall take said water in the proportion as follows: fyrum Jones, 7/167; Henry Bowler, 23/167; John Bowler, 62/167; Mar Bracken, Ih/l67; Henry Hunt, 17/167; Albert Truman Ui/l67. 31- Veyo Irrigation Company, Veyo, Washington Co., Utah. The right to divert and use with priority date Mar. 5, 1915 at the point and for the purpose specified in paragraph 23 of the Schedule of Rights, an amount of water from said Santa Clara River equal to the amount of water from Moody Wash, a tributary of said Magotsu Creek, saved by means of the works on said Moody Wash constructed by said Veyo Irrigation Company under the terms of and as described in application to approprirate water No. 6092 on file and of record in the office of the State Engineer of Utah, to which record reference is hereby made, and discharged into said Santa Clara River ; the amount so saved being hereby determined to be 25 per cent of the amount of water flowing in said Moody Wash at the intake of said works constructed by said Veyo Irrigation Conpany on said Moocty- Wash, when said water isdiverted into and carried through said words, which is in excess of 0.5 c.f.s. and not in excess of 2.5 c.f.s. there being no saving by reason of the use of said works when said flow exceeds 2.5 cf.s. or does not reach 0,5 c.f.s. The actuall determination of the amount so saved and discharged into Santa Clara river and the amount which said Veyo Irrigation Company shall be entitled to divert and use hereunder, shall be made by the Commissioner appointed to distribute the waters herein decreed, upon investigation from time to time. This appropriation is founded $pon application to appropriate water No. 6092 filed and of record in the office of the State Engineer of Uta£, to which record reference 4 |
Source |
Original book: Utah exhibits [of the] State of Arizona, complainant, v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, defendants, United States of America and State of Nevada, interveners, State of New Mexico and State of Utah, parties |