OCR Text |
Show 650 Page Re The Power Authority of the State of New York, Project No. 2000, 15 F. R. 946 (1950)_________________________________________ 281 Ramshorn Ditch Co. v. United States, 269 Fed. 80 (C. A. 8, 1920)- 163,164 Rio Grande Western R. Go. v. Stringham, 239 U. S. 44 (1915)______ 632 Roberts v. Spencer, 40 L. D. 306 (1911)_________________________ 209 Rock Greek Ditch & Flume Co. v. Miller, 93 Mont. 248, 17 P. 2d 1074 (1933)_______________________________________________ 155 Rockland Light & Power Company, F. P. C. Docket E-6220, November 29, 1945___________________________________________________ 471 Rosebud Land d Improvement Co. v. Carterville Irr. Dist., 102 Mont. 465, 58 P. 2d 765 (1936)_____________________________________ 173 Ruddy v. Rossi, 248 U. S. 104 (1918)____________________________ 30 Sadie A. Hawley, 43 L. D. 364 (1914)___________________________ 222 Safe Harbor Water Power Corp. v. Federal Power Commission, 179 F. 2d 179 (C. A. 3, 1949), cert, den., 339 U. S. 957 (1950)____23, 285, 286 St. Anthony Falls Water Power Co. v. St. Paul Water Commissioners, 168 U. S. 349 (1897)_________________________________________ 14 Sands v. Manistee River Improvement Co., 123 U. S. 288 (1887)_____ 74 Sanitary District v. United States, 266 TJ. S. 405 (1925)___________ 26 Savannah River Electric Co. v. Federal Power Commission, 164 F. 2d 408 (G. A. 4, 1947)_____________________________________ 281 Scott v. Lattig, 227 tJ. S. 229 (1913)______________________________ 12 Scranton v. Wheeler, 179 U. S. 141 (1900)_______________________24, 26 Shively v. Bowlby, 152 U. S. 1 (1894)___________________________ 12 Shoshone Irrigation District v. Lincoln Land Co., 51 F. 2d 128 (D. O. Wyo. 1930)__________________________________________ 225 The Siren, 7 Wall. 152 (U. S. 1868)______________________________ 7, 52 Skeem v. United States, 273 Fed. 93 (O. A. 9, 1921)_______________ 249 Smith v. State of Maryland, 18 How. 71 (U. S. 1885)_______________ 12 Snower v. Hope Drainage Dist., 2 F. Supp. 931 (D. O. Mo. 1933)_____ 173 South CaroUna v. Georgia, 93 U. S. 4 (1876)_________________11, 59, 66 South Carolina v. United States, 199 U. S. 437 (1905)____________ 386 Southern California Edison Company, Project No. 1930, F. P. C. Order of May 18, 1950___________________________________________ 332 Sperry v. Elephant Butte Irr. Dist., 33 N. Mex. 482, 270 Pac. 889 (1928);__________________________________________________172, 184 Spooner v. McConnell, 22 Fed. Oas. 939, No. 13,245 (C. O. D. Ohio, 1838)_____________________________________________________ 15 Standard Oil Co. of California v. California, 291 U. S. 242 (1934)____ 54 Stanley v. Schwalby, 162 U. S. 255 (1896)________________________52,53 State ex rel. Buokwalter v. City of Lakeland, 112 Fla. 200, 150 So. 508 (1933)_________________________________________________ 173 State ex rel. Dyer v. Sims, 133 W. Va. -, 58 S. E. 2d 766, decided April 4, 1950__________________________________________68, 69, 342 State ex rel. Malott v. Board of Oom'rs. of Cascade County, 89 Mont. 37, 296 Pac. 1 (1931)________________________________________ 174 State of Iowa v. Federal Power Commission, 178 F. 2d 421 (O. A. 8,1949), cert, den., 339 U. S. 979 (1950)________________________ 276 |