OCR Text |
Show -3- Proposal and findings of governors Governor Young's proposal to Denver conference (August, 1927) Findings of the upper basin governors (August, 1927) The Boulder Canyon project act (December, 1928) Arizona's present position 1. To Arizona her tributaries except such waters reaching the main stream. 2. To Nevada 300,- 000 acre-feet of 3a water. 3. The balance of 3a water; to Ari-zona 233,800 acre-feet perfected rights; to California 2,159,-000 acre-feet perfected rights; balance divided equally between States, or Arizona, 2,637,400; California, 4,-562,600. 4. 3b water in main stream divided equally between California and Arizona. 5. Surplus water in main stream divided equally between California and Arizona. 6. Mexican burden not mentioned. 7. Limitation on Arizona's time to use water, 20 years. Same .... Same __ Arizona 3,000,000; California 4,200.-000. Given to Arizona to be supplied from tributaries. Same Same No limitation.... 1. To Arizona the Gila River except such waters reaching the main stream. Same ____________ Arizona, 2,800,000; California, 4,400,-000. Not mentioned.. Same One-half burden of lower basin to be borne by Arizona and one-half by California. No limitation............ To Arizona her tributaries including the Gila, except such waters reach-ing the main stream. Same. Arizona, 2,800,000; California, 4,400,-000. Divided equally between California and Arizona. Same. Same. No limitation. Note.-The documents referred to are part of the record of the Denver proceedings, the Boulder Canyon project act, and the minimum Arizona requirements. |
Source |
Original book: [State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants, United States of America, State of Nevada, State of New Mexico, State of Utah, interveners] : California exhibits. |