| OCR Text |
Show CALIFORNIA DEFENDANTS Exhibit No. 2013C Identification:.................... Admitted: .JU.L1.8.1957 Extract From Debate on H.R. 5773, S. 728, SJ. Res. 164 and H. Res. 208 (Fourth Swing-Johnson Bill), 70th Cong., 1st and 2d Sess. [70 Cong. Rec. 459-72 (December 12, 1928)] Mr. Phipps. Mr. President, will the Senator from Arizona yield to me for a moment? Mr. Hayden. I yield. Mr. Phipps. Referring to the amendment which is now before the Senate,1 in order to remove any possible misunderstanding regarding the 4,400,000 acre-feet of water, I desire to perfect the amendment by inserting, on page 3, line 4, after the word "by," the words "paragraph (a) of article 3 of," so that it will show that that allocation of water refers directly to the seven and one-half million acre-feet of water that are mentioned in paragraph 3. Mr. Hayden. I will state that I have no objection to the amendment offered by the Senator from Colorado to his own amendment, because it makes it even more in conformity with the amendment that I now offer. The Presiding Officer. The Chair will state that the Senator from Colorado has the right to modify his amendment. xCal. Exh. No. 2012 with the last word of line 2, page 3, amended from "six" to read "four" (footnote supplied). |
| Source |
Original book: [State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants, United States of America, State of Nevada, State of New Mexico, State of Utah, interveners] : California exhibits. |
