Western Waters AZ. vs CA.
Contents | 333 of 457

page 35

Update Item Information
Title AZ vs. CA:13 California Exhibits, Vol. XIII; Nos. 1800-1842; 1901-1906; 2000-2044
Creator Arizona, complainant.; California, ; defendant.; Palo Verde Irrigation District (Calif.), ; defendant.; United States.; Supreme Court.
Subject Water rights; Water consumption; Rivers
OCR Text [State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants, United States of America, State of Nevada, State of New Mexico, State of Utah, interveners] : California exhibits.
Date 1958
Type Text
Format application/pdf
Language eng
Rights Management Digital Image Copyright 2005, University of Utah. All Rights Reserved.
Holding Institution 5th Special Coll. Rare, University Library, California State University, Long Beach
Source Physical Dimensions 25 v. : ill. (some folded) ; 25 cm.
Scanning Contractor Backstage Library Works - 1180 S. 800 E. Orem, UT 84097.
ARK ark:/87278/s6th8kkt
Setname wwdl_azvca
ID 1125838
Reference URL https://collections.lib.utah.edu/ark:/87278/s6th8kkt

Page Metadata

Title page 35
OCR Text -35- ment of the Senator from Arizona if the Senator from Arizona withdraws his amendment. Mr. Hayden. Would it not then be possible for the Senator from Colorado to immediately reoffer his amendment? The Vice President. The Senator from Colorado could do that. Mr. Hayden. I want to state to the Senate that what I am trying to accomplish is to get a vote on the one particular question of whether the quantity of water which the State of California may divert from the Colorado River should be 4,200,000 acre-feet or 4,600,000 acre-feet. I can state in 15 or 20 minutes all the reasons why Arizona favors the lesser figure, and then the Senate may have a vote upon that question. Mr. Phipps. Mr. President, will the Senator yield? Mr. Hayden. I yield. Mr. Phipps. I desire to call attention to the fact that 4,600,000 acre-feet was the figure adopted by the Senate committee1 and was written in the substitute bill offered by the Senator from California [Mr. Johnson].2 Therefore it seems to me that the point comes right down to the question of 4,600,000 acre-feet as recommended by the Senate committee and 4,200,000 acre-feet as written in the amendment of the Senator from Arizona. Mr. Hayden. And upon that particular issue and upon nothing else I desire to have a vote of the Senate at this time. 1Ol\. Exh. No. 2001. 2CaL Exh. No. 2010, pp. 6-7.
Format application/pdf
Source Original book: [State of Arizona, complainant v. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, California, City of San Diego, California, and County of San Diego, California, defendants, United States of America, State of Nevada, State of New Mexico, State of Utah, interveners] : California exhibits.
Resource Identifier 130525-UUM-AvC-v13t2015_page 35.jpg
Setname wwdl_azvca
ID 1125713
Reference URL https://collections.lib.utah.edu/ark:/87278/s6th8kkt/1125713